2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0006-3207(03)00025-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strong effects of a plantation with Pinus patula on Andean subpáramo vegetation: a case study from Colombia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
19
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2). Our results concur with other studies that show afforestation of natural ecosystems alters habitat substantially for native flora and fauna (Richardson and Van Wilgen 1986;Van Wesenbeeck et al 2003;Alrababah et al 2007;Lantschner et al 2008), with particularly strong negative effects on specialist grassland and shrubland species (Andres and Ojeda 2002;Freemark et al 2002;Buscardo et al 2008). While Felton et al (2010) found no significant differences in plant species richness between plantations and pasture lands, their study grouped together native and artificial grasslands used for grazing into one pasture category.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2). Our results concur with other studies that show afforestation of natural ecosystems alters habitat substantially for native flora and fauna (Richardson and Van Wilgen 1986;Van Wesenbeeck et al 2003;Alrababah et al 2007;Lantschner et al 2008), with particularly strong negative effects on specialist grassland and shrubland species (Andres and Ojeda 2002;Freemark et al 2002;Buscardo et al 2008). While Felton et al (2010) found no significant differences in plant species richness between plantations and pasture lands, their study grouped together native and artificial grasslands used for grazing into one pasture category.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Changes in land management with plantation establishment, such as the exclusion or alteration of grazing regimes or draining, can affect plant diversity and community structure as well (Buscardo et al 2008). Plantation establishment will also differentially affect particular native grassland and shrubland species (Igboanugo et al 1990;Van Wesenbeeck et al 2003;Cremene et al 2005;Chirino et al 2006) as in the case of native fynbos afforestation in South Africa where geophytes and wind dispersed species survived under plantations whereas woody large-leaved species such as protea did not (Richardson and Van Wilgen 1986). Changes in community structure are also reflected in changing amounts of exotic versus native species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, previous research has shown that afforestation using different pine species (Pinus sp.) can have a negative impact on floristic diversity, species composition and the prospect of progressive succession (Andrés & Ojeda 2002, Van Wesenbeeck et al 2003, McNeely 2005, Barčić et al 2006). However, a number of other ameliorative effects of afforestation with these species, such as erosion control (Cao et al 2007), the improvement of certain soil properties such as organic matter content, N content, C/N ratio, readily available P and K (Panagopoulos & Hatzistathis 1995, Qiu et al 2010 as well as atmospheric carbon sequestration in biomass and soil (Richter et al 1999, Ouimet et al 2007 should not be overlooked.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the kind of dominant tree species (Pinus spp. and Abies religiosa) at the highest sites (3,000 and 3,500 m) has an influence on the herbaceous community because the coniferous litter changes the soil properties (Whittaker 1975, van Wesenbeeck et al 2003. Forest use intensity effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%