2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2015.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strong discontinuity embedded approach with standard SOS formulation: Element formulation, energy-based crack-tracking strategy, and validations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
78
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
2
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…26(a) the curves of force P versus applied vertical displacement u, given from the proposed Is-XFEM with k = 0.05, are compared to the experimental results and those reported in the literature [73,75]. As expected, mesh independent responses are obtained for both coarse and fine meshes.…”
Section: Dens-4csupporting
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…26(a) the curves of force P versus applied vertical displacement u, given from the proposed Is-XFEM with k = 0.05, are compared to the experimental results and those reported in the literature [73,75]. As expected, mesh independent responses are obtained for both coarse and fine meshes.…”
Section: Dens-4csupporting
confidence: 49%
“…In particular, only the later two methods are capable of reproducing the negative vertical force observed in the test, even if the applied vertical displacement is positive, corresponding to pulling apart of the fixing frames. To the best knowledge of the authors, only References [74,72,75] reported success in modeling this curious result. In this sense, the s-XFEM (k = 1) exhibits much more severe stress (a) Coarse mesh.…”
Section: Dens-4cmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…For this purpose, the energybased crack-tracking strategy presented in [14] is modified by the authors to be incorporated into the SDA (see [15] for details). For validation purposes, numerical examples of (i) an L-shaped panel and (ii) a pull-out test in isothermal conditions were simulated, showing the applicability of the used model.…”
Section: Simulation Of Crack Propagationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This choice is justified by the following reasoning. Firstly, tracking algorithms provide numerical solutions that are free of mesh-induced directional bias [45,16,17,46,47,48]. Secondly, the particular tracking algorithm can be effectively combined with constitutive models suitable for quasi-brittle materials, like anisotropic [31,49] or isotropic ones [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up to date approaches using tracking algorithms have focused mostly on cracks nucleating from the boundary of the domain or from pre-existent flaws and propagating in a single orientation (see for instance [46,47,50,51,52,53]). This confines the application of tracking algorithms to a very narrow family of structural problems, in which the origin of cracks is either known prior to the analysis, or it is imposed by including material or geometrical perturbations within the analysed numerical domain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%