Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1998
DOI: 10.1088/0305-4470/31/50/008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strong-coupling expansions for the -symmetric oscillators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
91
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
6
91
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, one can work, alternatively, with the non-standard bra-vectors [25] ψ| → Q · ψ|P ≡ ψ|, Q = ±1 (15) admitting that the norm can be formally indeterminate [26]. This reflects the nonHermiticity of the Hamiltonians and facilitates also the perturbative PT symmetric calculations [31]. The latter coinsiderations leave the consequent interpretation of the PT symmetry still open [32]- [36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, one can work, alternatively, with the non-standard bra-vectors [25] ψ| → Q · ψ|P ≡ ψ|, Q = ±1 (15) admitting that the norm can be formally indeterminate [26]. This reflects the nonHermiticity of the Hamiltonians and facilitates also the perturbative PT symmetric calculations [31]. The latter coinsiderations leave the consequent interpretation of the PT symmetry still open [32]- [36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first examples of these potentials have even been found using perturbation techniques [19]. Further ones have been identified using semiclassical approximations [5,20] and numerical algorithms [21]. A number of the exactly solvable PT symmetric potentials have been revealed as the analogues of their Hermitian, real special cases [13,15,22,23,24].…”
Section: The Scarf II Potential and Its Pt Symmetric Versionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the anharmonic V (x) = x 2 + igx 3 , its perturbative confirmation (viz., the proof using the Borel summability) has even been made available in the early eighties [3]. Very recently, the further numerical and quasi-classical evidence has been provided by the non-polynomial V (x) = x 2 (ix) δ [2] and by its supersymmetric partners [4] as well as by certain hyperbolic [5] and trigonometric [6] models. An additional, purely non-numerical backing of the hypothesis may, last but not least, rely upon the exactly solvable PT symmetric V (x) = exp(ix) [4] and upon the quasiexactly solvable polynomial V (x) = −x 4 + iax 3 + bx 2 + icx [7] and non-polynomial…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%