2020
DOI: 10.1039/d0ra06431a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strong correlation between flux pinning and epitaxial strain in the GdBa2Cu3O7−x/La0.7Sr0.3MnO3 nanocrystalline heterostructure

Abstract: The effect of magnetic flux pinning is investigated in GdBa2Cu3O7 (GdBCO) thin films with two different types of ferromagnetic La0.7Sr0.3MnO3 (LSMO) buffers (nanoparticles and a layer) deposited on an STO substrate.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(45 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Surely, the q parameter plays an important role in suppressing the overall superconductivity with a magnetic field. Oh et al 26 have shown that flux pinning in the FM/SC heterostructure is governed by the interaction of vortices with pinning sites induced by structural defects in addition to magnetic pinning. The structural disorder of the CuO 2 planes at the interface due to coupling between the FM and SC layer acts as additional pinning mechanism.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surely, the q parameter plays an important role in suppressing the overall superconductivity with a magnetic field. Oh et al 26 have shown that flux pinning in the FM/SC heterostructure is governed by the interaction of vortices with pinning sites induced by structural defects in addition to magnetic pinning. The structural disorder of the CuO 2 planes at the interface due to coupling between the FM and SC layer acts as additional pinning mechanism.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The slopes of the double logarithmic functions of PSD, which are related to the growth mode of the samples, show no significant difference with α values of 3.14 ± 0.03, indicating identical growth conditions for all samples. 37 In contrast, the ZnO53 sample exhibits a distinct feature, despite having a similar slope, it has a longer power law region; thus, it reaches a plateau at a higher frequency of 0.5 nm −1 . The higher spatial frequency of the slope and larger area under the PDS function translates to a larger number of grain boundaries in the surface morphology.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The image matrices were analyzed using the power spectra distribution (PSD) function to find the periodicity of surface morphology; the result of the PSD analyses is shown in Figure d. The slopes of the double logarithmic functions of PSD, which are related to the growth mode of the samples, show no significant difference with α values of 3.14 ± 0.03, indicating identical growth conditions for all samples . In contrast, the ZnO53 sample exhibits a distinct feature, despite having a similar slope, it has a longer power law region; thus, it reaches a plateau at a higher frequency of 0.5 nm –1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We examined whether the structural distortion of LSMO by different substrates has an effect on the GdBCO matrix. The average Cu–O bond lengths are calculated from the Cu K-edge EXAFS data in Figure c using the same method as conducted in previous paper, , and the results are compared in Figure d,e. In the case of GdBCO/LSMO/STO, the Cu–O bond length is nearly constant to be 1.915 Å, shorter than that of the pure sample.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The series of GdBa 2 Cu 3 O 7– x (GdBCO)/La 0.7 Sr 0.3 MnO 3 (LSMO) bilayers are fabricated on single crystal SrTiO 3 (STO) and LaAlO 3 (LAO) (100) substrates using a pulsed laser deposition (PLD) technique (KrF excimer laser, LPX pro240, 248 nm). The details of the fabrication process can be found in our previous works. , The thickness of the GdBCO layer is fixed to be about 400 nm, where the T c value is optimized, in consideration of the application of high -T c superconductors, and the thickness of the LSMO layer varies as x = 25, 50, and 100 nm on STO and as y = 20, 40, 50, and 80 nm on the LAO substrate. Depending upon the thickness of the LSMO and substrate, the samples are denoted as pure, S x ( x = 25, 50, and 100), and L y ( y = 20, 40, 50, and 80).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%