2016
DOI: 10.1080/00268976.2016.1203037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strong cooperative effects between π-hole and dihydrogen bonds interactions: a computational study

Abstract: The aim of this work is to study cooperative effects between the π -hole and dihydrogen bond (DHB) interactions in the ternary X 3 BNCHHM complexes, where X = H, F and M = Li, Na, BeH, BeF, BeCH 3 , MgH, MgF, MgCH 3 . The properties of the resulting complexes are studied by molecular electrostatic potential, non-covalent interaction index and natural bond orbital analyses. It is found that there is a substantial shortening of HH bond distances in the X 3 BNCHHM complexes, especially in M = Li and Na. Such rema… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The interaction energies of the binary and ternary complexes are given in Table . The B⋅⋅⋅N interaction energies in the binary complexes are between −5.70 kcal/mol in F 3 B⋅⋅⋅NCH and −66.49 kcal/mol in C 5 H 5 B⋅⋅⋅NCLi, which are in good agreement with the energy range of B⋅⋅⋅N interactions in literature ,,. For example, the calculated interaction energy of the F 3 B⋅⋅⋅NCH complex in the present study (‐5.70 kcal/mol) is close to that reported by Graboweski (‐5.20 kcal/mol) at the MP2/aug‐cc‐pVTZ level .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The interaction energies of the binary and ternary complexes are given in Table . The B⋅⋅⋅N interaction energies in the binary complexes are between −5.70 kcal/mol in F 3 B⋅⋅⋅NCH and −66.49 kcal/mol in C 5 H 5 B⋅⋅⋅NCLi, which are in good agreement with the energy range of B⋅⋅⋅N interactions in literature ,,. For example, the calculated interaction energy of the F 3 B⋅⋅⋅NCH complex in the present study (‐5.70 kcal/mol) is close to that reported by Graboweski (‐5.20 kcal/mol) at the MP2/aug‐cc‐pVTZ level .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…1 There are some well-known methodologies for the evaluation of the cooperativity of noncovalent bonds and the calculation of related cooperative energies. The following equations have been frequently used for the evaluation of the cooperativity of coinage-metal bonds with other types of interactions 2–13 and also that of intermolecular noncovalent bonds, especially those including hydrogen bonds, 14–25 dihydrogen bonds, 26–28 beryllium bonds, 29,30 lithium bonds, 31–34 lithium–π, 35 halogen bonds, 36–48 chalcogen bonds, 49–51 pnicogen bonds, 52–56 cation–π interactions, 57–60 anion–π interactions, 61–63 π⋯π interactions, 64 σ -hole 65,66 and π -hole 67–70 interactions in ternary systems. Δ ABC = IE total ABC − (IE ABC A–B + IE ABC B–C + IE ABC A–C ) E coop = SE ABC − (SE AB + SE BC + SE ABC AC ) E coop = SE ABC − (SE AB + SE BC )In the above equations, Δ ABC and E coop correspond to the three-body term 71–77 and cooperative energy, respectively. The term IE total ABC is used for the value of the total interaction energy of the ABC system, and the terms IE ABC AB , IE ABC BC and IE ABC AC are used for pairwise interaction energies in the structure of the ABC system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%