“…Compared with Proposition 3.3, Theorem 3.4, and Theorem 3.7 in [ 11 ], respectively, our Theorems 3.1 , 3.2 , and 3.3 improve and develop them in the following aspects: - GSVI ( 1.3 ) with solutions being also fixed points of a continuous pseudocontinuous mapping in [ 12 , Proposition 3.3, Theorem 3.4, and Theorem 3.7] is extended to GSVI ( 1.3 ) with solutions being also common solutions of a finite family of generalized mixed equilibrium problems (GMEPs) and fixed points of a continuous pseudocontinuous mapping in our Theorems 3.1 , 3.2 , and 3.3 ;
- in the argument process of our Theorems 3.1 , 3.2 , and 3.3 , we use the variable parameters and (resp., and ) in place of the fixed parameters λ and ν in the proof of [ 12 , Proposition 3.3, Theorem 3.4, and Theorem 3.7], and additionally deal with a pool of variable parameters (resp., ) involving a finite family of GMEPs;
- the iterative schemes in our Theorems 3.1 , 3.2 , and 3.3 are more advantageous and more flexible than the iterative schemes in [ 12 , Proposition 3.3, Theorem 3.4, and Theorem 3.7], because they can be applied to solving three problems (i.e., GSVI ( 1.3 ), a finite family of GMEPs, and the fixed point problem of a continuous pseudocontractive mapping) and involve much more parameter sequences;
- it is worth emphasizing that our general implicit iterative scheme ( 3.1 ) is very different from Jung’s composite implicit iterative scheme in [ 12 ], because the term “ ” in Jung’s implicit scheme is replaced by the term “ ” in our implicit scheme ( 3.1 ). Moreover, the term “ ” in Jung’s explicit scheme is replaced by the term “ ” in our explicit scheme ( 3.3 ).
…”