2017
DOI: 10.22436/jnsa.010.07.42
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strong convergence of some iterative algorithms for a general system of variational inequalities

Abstract: In this paper, we introduce two iterative algorithms (one implicit algorithm and one explicit algorithm) for finding a common element of the solution set of a general system of variational inequalities for continuous monotone mappings and the fixed point set of a continuous pseudocontractive mapping in a Hilbert space. First, this system of variational inequalities is proven to be equivalent to a fixed point problem of nonexpansive mapping. Then we establish strong convergence of the sequence generated by the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(17 reference statements)
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with Proposition 3.3, Theorem 3.4, and Theorem 3.7 in [ 11 ], respectively, our Theorems 3.1 , 3.2 , and 3.3 improve and develop them in the following aspects: GSVI ( 1.3 ) with solutions being also fixed points of a continuous pseudocontinuous mapping in [ 12 , Proposition 3.3, Theorem 3.4, and Theorem 3.7] is extended to GSVI ( 1.3 ) with solutions being also common solutions of a finite family of generalized mixed equilibrium problems (GMEPs) and fixed points of a continuous pseudocontinuous mapping in our Theorems 3.1 , 3.2 , and 3.3 ; in the argument process of our Theorems 3.1 , 3.2 , and 3.3 , we use the variable parameters and (resp., and ) in place of the fixed parameters λ and ν in the proof of [ 12 , Proposition 3.3, Theorem 3.4, and Theorem 3.7], and additionally deal with a pool of variable parameters (resp., ) involving a finite family of GMEPs; the iterative schemes in our Theorems 3.1 , 3.2 , and 3.3 are more advantageous and more flexible than the iterative schemes in [ 12 , Proposition 3.3, Theorem 3.4, and Theorem 3.7], because they can be applied to solving three problems (i.e., GSVI ( 1.3 ), a finite family of GMEPs, and the fixed point problem of a continuous pseudocontractive mapping) and involve much more parameter sequences; it is worth emphasizing that our general implicit iterative scheme ( 3.1 ) is very different from Jung’s composite implicit iterative scheme in [ 12 ], because the term “ ” in Jung’s implicit scheme is replaced by the term “ ” in our implicit scheme ( 3.1 ). Moreover, the term “ ” in Jung’s explicit scheme is replaced by the term “ ” in our explicit scheme ( 3.3 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Compared with Proposition 3.3, Theorem 3.4, and Theorem 3.7 in [ 11 ], respectively, our Theorems 3.1 , 3.2 , and 3.3 improve and develop them in the following aspects: GSVI ( 1.3 ) with solutions being also fixed points of a continuous pseudocontinuous mapping in [ 12 , Proposition 3.3, Theorem 3.4, and Theorem 3.7] is extended to GSVI ( 1.3 ) with solutions being also common solutions of a finite family of generalized mixed equilibrium problems (GMEPs) and fixed points of a continuous pseudocontinuous mapping in our Theorems 3.1 , 3.2 , and 3.3 ; in the argument process of our Theorems 3.1 , 3.2 , and 3.3 , we use the variable parameters and (resp., and ) in place of the fixed parameters λ and ν in the proof of [ 12 , Proposition 3.3, Theorem 3.4, and Theorem 3.7], and additionally deal with a pool of variable parameters (resp., ) involving a finite family of GMEPs; the iterative schemes in our Theorems 3.1 , 3.2 , and 3.3 are more advantageous and more flexible than the iterative schemes in [ 12 , Proposition 3.3, Theorem 3.4, and Theorem 3.7], because they can be applied to solving three problems (i.e., GSVI ( 1.3 ), a finite family of GMEPs, and the fixed point problem of a continuous pseudocontractive mapping) and involve much more parameter sequences; it is worth emphasizing that our general implicit iterative scheme ( 3.1 ) is very different from Jung’s composite implicit iterative scheme in [ 12 ], because the term “ ” in Jung’s implicit scheme is replaced by the term “ ” in our implicit scheme ( 3.1 ). Moreover, the term “ ” in Jung’s explicit scheme is replaced by the term “ ” in our explicit scheme ( 3.3 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…the iterative schemes in our Theorems 3.1 , 3.2 , and 3.3 are more advantageous and more flexible than the iterative schemes in [ 12 , Proposition 3.3, Theorem 3.4, and Theorem 3.7], because they can be applied to solving three problems (i.e., GSVI ( 1.3 ), a finite family of GMEPs, and the fixed point problem of a continuous pseudocontractive mapping) and involve much more parameter sequences;…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations