1997
DOI: 10.1021/cr940396v
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strong Closed-Shell Interactions in Inorganic Chemistry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

82
1,643
9
37

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,349 publications
(1,792 citation statements)
references
References 453 publications
82
1,643
9
37
Order By: Relevance
“…The MP2 results are likely to be more reliable than the BP86 results, since they include also the weak interaction effects, and we thus conclude that the supersystem is energetically lower than the two constituents. (It is known that the MP2 method rather exaggerates the dispersion energies, compared to a CCSD(T) limit for the same basis [16,17].) A larger basis, which cannot be used at present, would be expected to strengthen the interaction [16].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The MP2 results are likely to be more reliable than the BP86 results, since they include also the weak interaction effects, and we thus conclude that the supersystem is energetically lower than the two constituents. (It is known that the MP2 method rather exaggerates the dispersion energies, compared to a CCSD(T) limit for the same basis [16,17].) A larger basis, which cannot be used at present, would be expected to strengthen the interaction [16].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(It is known that the MP2 method rather exaggerates the dispersion energies, compared to a CCSD(T) limit for the same basis [16,17].) A larger basis, which cannot be used at present, would be expected to strengthen the interaction [16]. Concerning the zero-point vibrational energy (ZPVE) corrections to the interaction energy, they were found to be negligible (0.4 kJ/mol) at the BP86 level.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ying and co-workers proposed that d 10 -d 10 metallophilic interaction was the reason for Hg 2+ binding to AuNCs [114,120].…”
Section: Reactive Quenchersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the physics literature, it is customary to call the stronger bonds "front bonds" and to call the weaker bonds "back bonds." [37][38][39] Because the back bonds formally correspond to closed-shell interactions, chemists call them "secondary" bonds, [40][41][42][43] or donor-acceptor interactions, 44 or, sometimes, hypervalent or 3-center bonds, where the distinction is only quantitative, if any. 42 Importantly, the secondary bonds are stronger than van der Waals interaction and are directional, similarly to their strictly-covalent counterparts.…”
Section: Ppσ-bonded Semiconductors: the Role Of The Secondary Ppσmentioning
confidence: 99%