2014
DOI: 10.1142/s1793525314500010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strong Banach property (T) for simple algebraic groups of higher rank

Abstract: In [Laf08, Laf09], Vincent Lafforgue proved strong Banach property (T) for SL 3 over a non archimedean local field F. In this paper, we extend his results to Sp 4 and therefore to any connected almost F -simple algebraic group with F -split rank ≥ 2. As applications, the family of expanders constructed by finite quotients of a lattice in such a group does not admit a uniform embedding in any Banach space of type > 1, and any affine isometric action of such a group, or of any cocompact lattice in it, in a Banac… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…If S denotes a finite symmetric generating set of Γ, and if Y i = Γ/Γ i is the corresponding graph with natural metric denoted by In the non-Archimedean setting, a strong analogue of Theorem A is known. Indeed, for a non-Archimedean local field F , Lafforgue proved that SL(3, F ) has property (T strong Banach ) (see [Laf08] and [Laf09]), and Liao proved that Sp(2, F ) has it as well, implying that any connected almost F -simple algebraic group with F -split rank at least 2 has property (T strong Banach ) (see [Lia13]). Analogues of the corollaries above follow as well.…”
Section: Strong E4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If S denotes a finite symmetric generating set of Γ, and if Y i = Γ/Γ i is the corresponding graph with natural metric denoted by In the non-Archimedean setting, a strong analogue of Theorem A is known. Indeed, for a non-Archimedean local field F , Lafforgue proved that SL(3, F ) has property (T strong Banach ) (see [Laf08] and [Laf09]), and Liao proved that Sp(2, F ) has it as well, implying that any connected almost F -simple algebraic group with F -split rank at least 2 has property (T strong Banach ) (see [Lia13]). Analogues of the corollaries above follow as well.…”
Section: Strong E4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We refer to Definition 2.2 for the definitions of type and cotype. Banach Strong (T) with respect to spaces of nontrivial type was recently extended to all higher rank algebraic groups over non-Archimedean local fields in [18]. This proves the conjecture in [1] in the non-Archimedean case, since every superreflexive Banach space has nontrivial type by [24].…”
Section: In the Norm Topology Of B(x) To A Projection On The π(G)-invmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Lafforgue proved that hyperbolic groups do not satisfy Strong Banach (T) with respect to Hilbert spaces (T Strong Hilb ), but for a local field F , SL(3, F ) has (T Strong Hilb ). In the case when F is non-Archimedean, it was proved in [13] and [14] (see also [17]) that SL(3, F ) satisfies Strong Banach property (T) with respect to the class of all Banach spaces of nontrivial (Rademacher) type, which is essentially the largest class of Banach spaces for which strong (T) could hold (for a non compact group). We refer to Definition 2.2 for the definitions of type and cotype.…”
Section: In the Norm Topology Of B(x) To A Projection On The π(G)-invmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, this implies that these expanders are superexpanders, since the class of Banach spaces with nontrivial type is known to be larger than the class of uniformly convex spaces. More examples of groups with strong property (T) or other Banach space versions of property (T) relative to various classes of Banach spaces were provided in [11][12][13]16,22,25]. Other examples of superexpanders, obtained by means of a combinatorial construction, were provided in the groundbreaking work of Mendel and Naor [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%