1980
DOI: 10.1016/0301-9268(80)90033-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stromatolite and ooid deposits within the fluvial and lacustrine sediments of the Precambrian Ventersdorp Supergroup of South Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
23
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3). A possible interpretation is that precursor OM of these kerogens thrived in warm waters undergoing intense evaporation, which is consistent with the continental depositional environments proposed for these formations (Buck, 1980;Hunter et al, 1998). …”
Section: Geochemical Perspectives Letterssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…3). A possible interpretation is that precursor OM of these kerogens thrived in warm waters undergoing intense evaporation, which is consistent with the continental depositional environments proposed for these formations (Buck, 1980;Hunter et al, 1998). …”
Section: Geochemical Perspectives Letterssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Archean terrestrial aquatic environments as old as 2.7 b.y. commonly contained benthic mats (e.g., Buck, 1980;Buick, 1992;Rye and Holland, 2000). Once these mats contained cyanobacteria, they likely developed O 2 oases even at very low net photosynthetic rates, such as the 0.05 µmol O 2 m -2 s -1 observed at 9.8 m in Lake Fryxell.…”
Section: Implications For Archean Oxygen Oasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3.5 Ga (Hofmann 1973;Allwood et al 2009). Unlike the Archean, where stromatolites have been observed as being limited to shallow-marine evaporitic basins (Lowe 1983;Allwood et al 2006;Schopf 2006), by the Proterozoic, they were present in siliciclastic nearshore, intertidal (Schieber 1999), and carbonate platforms (Beukes 1987), as well as in epicontinental alkaline lakes and rivers, where the mats were commonly dolomitized and silicified (Buck 1980). Morphologically, these ranged from domes and simple columns to elaborately branched and bulbous structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%