2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12576-020-00770-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stroking stimulation of the skin elicits 50-kHz ultrasonic vocalizations in young adult rats

Abstract: The present study aimed to clarify if stroking stimulation of the skin produces positive emotion in rats. 50-kHz ultrasonic vocalizations (USVs) were recorded as an index of the positive emotion. Stroking stimulation was applied to the ventral, dorsal, or head region of the body while the rat was in a vertical holding condition. Rats emit abundant 50-kHz USVs in response to stroking, and the number of the USVs was not different among these three stimulated regions. Other stimulations, such as light touching of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although adults rarely play, the appetitive value of light tactile stimulation, which only partially resembles rough-and-tumble play, still retained rewarding play value in young adults, and tactile stimulation induced emission of 50 kHz calls in habituated animals [ 60 ]. Interestingly, other forms of tactile stimulation by human hand in different parts of the rat’s body, which had low resemblance to natural rough-and-tumble play, or were entirely unnatural to rats (e.g., holding rats in a vertical position and touching their flanks), also induced the emission of 50 kHz calls, although at a lower rate than during natural play [ 60 , 112 ].…”
Section: Evolution and Functions Of Rat Vocalizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although adults rarely play, the appetitive value of light tactile stimulation, which only partially resembles rough-and-tumble play, still retained rewarding play value in young adults, and tactile stimulation induced emission of 50 kHz calls in habituated animals [ 60 ]. Interestingly, other forms of tactile stimulation by human hand in different parts of the rat’s body, which had low resemblance to natural rough-and-tumble play, or were entirely unnatural to rats (e.g., holding rats in a vertical position and touching their flanks), also induced the emission of 50 kHz calls, although at a lower rate than during natural play [ 60 , 112 ].…”
Section: Evolution and Functions Of Rat Vocalizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NAc plays roles in positive emotional behavior such as motivation, drug abuse, alcohol, and rewards 15 , 16 . Blockade of dopamine receptors in the NAc reduces 50-kHz USVs as a marker of positive emotion induced by tactile stimulation of the skin 17 , 18 . The dorsal NAc shell activation of dynorphinergic neurons drives reward behavior and the ventral NAc shell drive aversion in mice 19 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On one hand, long (or not that long 16 ), frequency-stable high-pitch vocalizations have been reported before (e.g. 17,18 ), notably as caused by intense cholinergic stimulation 19 or higher shock-dose fear conditioning 20 . However, they have not been systematically defined, described or demonstrated to be a separate type of vocalization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…While they wrote in the introduction that "high-pitch (>32 kHz), long and monotonous ultrasonic vocalizations have not yet been described", they wrote in the discussion that "long (or not that long (Biały et al, 2019)), frequency-stable high-pitch vocalizations have been reported before (e.g. Sales, 1979;Shimoju et al, 2020), notably as caused by intense cholinergic stimulation (Brudzynski and Bihari, 1990) or higher shock-dose fear conditioning (Wöhr et al, 2005)" (and I wish to add that to my knowledge this list provided by the authors is incomplete). Therefore, I believe, the strong claims made in abstract ("we are the first to describe a new-type..."), introduction ("have not yet been described"), and results ("new calls") are not justified.…”
Section: Reviewer #2 (Public Review)mentioning
confidence: 99%