2023
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-023-11979-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strokecopilot: a literature-based clinical decision support system for acute ischemic stroke treatment

Stanislas Demuth,
Joris Müller,
Véronique Quenardelle
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In suicide research, it has been shown that machine learning-based suicide risk predictions outperform all widely researched theories of suicide [ 47 ], opening the possibility to stratify patients with self-harm according to risk for adverse outcomes, such as death by suicide, and provide tailored intervention preventions. Despite their clear usefulness in other clinical domains [ 48 51 ], evidence of effective implementation of these techniques into clinically useful prediction tools for self-harm and related adverse outcomes is lacking. This may be due to the absence of a user-oriented personalised approach, i.e., the failure to actively involve both patients and clinicians in the development of this kind of software tools [ 52 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In suicide research, it has been shown that machine learning-based suicide risk predictions outperform all widely researched theories of suicide [ 47 ], opening the possibility to stratify patients with self-harm according to risk for adverse outcomes, such as death by suicide, and provide tailored intervention preventions. Despite their clear usefulness in other clinical domains [ 48 51 ], evidence of effective implementation of these techniques into clinically useful prediction tools for self-harm and related adverse outcomes is lacking. This may be due to the absence of a user-oriented personalised approach, i.e., the failure to actively involve both patients and clinicians in the development of this kind of software tools [ 52 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%