Stroke self-efficacy questionnaire – Denmark (SSEQ-DK): test–retest of the Danish version

Pedersen, Sedsel Kristine Stage; Pallesen, Hanne

doi:10.1080/10749357.2021.2016097

Cited by 8 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 37 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The questionnaire has undergone Rasch analysis to further evaluate its psychometric properties, and confirmed that the two subscales showed good construct validity and the items yielded satisfying results according to the requirements for Rasch analysis [13]. The SSEQ has been translated into several languages, including Danish, Portuguese, Turkish, Hausa, Italian, Brazilian, Chinese, and Arabic [3,6,9,[17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. These translations have overall been successful in their validation and cross-cultural adaptations.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 86%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Swedish Stroke Self-Efficacy Questionnaire: translation and cross-cultural adaptation

Klockar,

Kylén,

McCarthy

et al. 2024

J Patient Rep Outcomes

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective To translate and cross-culturally adapt the Stroke Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (SSEQ) from English to Swedish and to evaluate psychometric properties of the questionnaire. Methods A cross-sectional study design, where the translation followed a process including initial translation, synthesis, backward translation, expert committee, and pretest. Content validity was assessed using Content validity index (CVI). Psychometric assessments included floor-ceiling effects and internal consistency. Results Language and cultural congruence were achieved, and content validity index scores were high (0.923-1). The psychometric evaluations provided acceptable outcomes concerning internal consistency, with Cronbach’s alpha scores for the total scale (0.902), the activities subscale (0.861) and the self-management subscale (0.818) respectively. Ceiling effects were evident, but no floor effects. Conclusion This study found the Swedish version of the SSEQ promising as a tool for assessment of self-efficacy in a Swedish stroke care setting, although further psychometric assessments are recommended in future studies.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 86%

“…Studies have shown that levels of self-efficacy can predict quality of life and functional independence for persons post-stroke [9]. High levels of self-efficacy have been associated with setting more advanced goals, reaching greater performance success, and being more resilient in challenging situations [10].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Swedish Stroke Self-Efficacy Questionnaire: translation and cross-cultural adaptation

Klockar,

Kylén,

McCarthy

et al. 2024

J Patient Rep Outcomes

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A higher total score suggests stronger perceived self-efficacy. The scale has been validated and used internationally in self-management studies [ 31 , 48 ].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Tailoring and Evaluating an Intervention to Support Self-management After Stroke: Protocol for a Multi-case, Mixed Methods Comparison Study

Elf¹,

Klockar²,

Kylén³

et al. 2022

JMIR Res Protoc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Self-management programs are recognized as a valuable approach to supporting people with long-term conditions, such as stroke, in managing their daily lives. Bridges Self-Management (Bridges) focuses on how practitioners interact and support patients’ confidence, skills, and knowledge, and it is an example of a complex intervention. Bridges has been developed and used across multiple health care pathways in the United Kingdom and is theoretically informed by social cognition theory and self-efficacy principles. Evidence shows that self-management programs based on the construct of self-efficacy can be effective. There is still much to learn about how health care services or pathways should implement support for self-management in a sustainable way and whether this implementation process is different depending on the context or culture of the team or service provided. Objective The aim of this study is to tailor and evaluate an intervention (Bridges) to support self-management after stroke in a Swedish context. Methods We will use a pretest-posttest design with a case study approach to evaluate the feasibility and implementation of self-management support in two stroke settings. This project includes a complex intervention and depends on the actions of individuals, different contexts, and the adaptation of behavior over time. A mixed methods approach was chosen to understand both outcomes and mechanisms of impact. Data collection will comprise outcome measurements and assessment tools as well as qualitative interviews. Data will be collected concurrently and integrated into a mixed methods design. Results Recruitment and data collection for the first site of the project ran from September 1, 2021, to January 17, 2022. The intervention at the first site was conducted from November 1, 2021, to March 5, 2022. The evaluation will start after the implementation phase. The second site has been recruited, and the baseline data collection will start in spring 2022. The intervention will start in early autumn 2022. Data collection will be completed by the end of 2022. Conclusions This study represents a unique, highly relevant, and innovative opportunity to maximize knowledge and minimize practice gaps in rehabilitation stroke care. The study will produce robust data on the intervention and in-depth data on the contextual factors and mechanisms related to the feasibility of the intervention and for whom it is feasible. Bridges has been used in the United Kingdom for more than 10 years, and this study will explore its contextualization and implementation within a Swedish stroke environment. The evaluation will study results at the patient, staff, and organizational levels and provide recommendations for the adoption and refinement of future efforts to support self-management. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/37672

show abstract

Construct validity, responsiveness, minimal detectable change, and minimal clinically important difference of the stroke self-efficacy questionnaire in individuals receiving stroke rehabilitation

Wu,

Li,

Chen

et al. 2024

Disability and Rehabilitation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Stroke self-efficacy questionnaire – Denmark (SSEQ-DK): test–retest of the Danish version

Cited by 8 publications

References 37 publications

The Swedish Stroke Self-Efficacy Questionnaire: translation and cross-cultural adaptation

The Swedish Stroke Self-Efficacy Questionnaire: translation and cross-cultural adaptation

Tailoring and Evaluating an Intervention to Support Self-management After Stroke: Protocol for a Multi-case, Mixed Methods Comparison Study

Construct validity, responsiveness, minimal detectable change, and minimal clinically important difference of the stroke self-efficacy questionnaire in individuals receiving stroke rehabilitation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About