Dear Editor, We undertook a practical literature review focusing on stroke unit (SU) access and patient outcomes. It is well known that organized inpatient stroke care optimizes post-stroke patient outcomes. 1 However, fragmentation of care and absence of uniform policy undermine SU access, necessitating the need for comprehensive and consistent stroke care management protocols. 2,3 Furthermore, while adherence to consistent protocol-based management is key to optimal SU care, equitable access is also a challenge. 3 The literature provides evidence that a top-down approach improves access to stroke care. 4,5 Introduction of relevant legislation in some American states substantially increased the proportion of hospitals with certified primary stroke centers, compared with states without such legislation (median: 43% and 13% of hospitals, respectively; p < 0.001). 4 Stroke legislation was also associated with increased availability of access to certified primary stroke centers. 4 Elsewhere, organized systems such as certification (Europe) 6 and high-level government overview (Canada) 7 are also used to formalize stroke care. A nuanced approach to legislation could help avoid controversy, as occurred during early debate over treatment with TPA, thereby facilitating the process. 8 Legislation is a powerful enabler, with researchers and clinicians uniquely placed to advocate for change and guide implementation. 9 Legislating for SUs could substantially increase the availability of access, strengthening the argument for legislative reform. 4,5 Consequently, should stroke law reform be championed in countries without legislation to better facilitate consistency and uniformity in standards of care, and thus improve equitable service delivery? Declaration of conflicting interests The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.