2021 Sixth International Conference on Informatics and Computing (ICIC) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/icic54025.2021.9632906
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stroke Disease Analysis and Classification Using Decision Tree and Random Forest Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They compared the performance of models built using linear SVM, quadratic SVM, and cubic SVM algorithms and found that linear SVM and quadratic SVM performed better on the test dataset, with an accuracy score of 95.2%. Puspitasari et al [4] compared the performance of stroke prediction models built using the random forest algorithm and the decision tree algorithm. They divided the training and test sets into five ratios of 59:50, 60:40, 70:30, 80:20, and 90:10 and did five experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They compared the performance of models built using linear SVM, quadratic SVM, and cubic SVM algorithms and found that linear SVM and quadratic SVM performed better on the test dataset, with an accuracy score of 95.2%. Puspitasari et al [4] compared the performance of stroke prediction models built using the random forest algorithm and the decision tree algorithm. They divided the training and test sets into five ratios of 59:50, 60:40, 70:30, 80:20, and 90:10 and did five experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, traditional diagnostic methods, such as computerized tomography, can be costly and time-consuming, making them less efficient 4 . Therefore, machine learning techniques have been widely used in recent years as a faster and more cost-effective way of diagnosing diseases, including stroke 5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20 .The diverse range of studies has used artificial intelligence algorithms and machine learning techniques to diagnose stroke disease. Arslan et al(2016) 5 used three different data mining approaches, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Stochastic Gradient Boost (SGB), and Penalized Logistic Regression (PLR), to analyze a dataset consisting of 80 patients and 112 healthy individuals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results obtained were acceptable for SVM and SGB models. In the study carried out by Puspitasari et al(2021) 6 , they utilized the "Stroke Prediction Dataset" containing 5110 records published on the Kaggle open database site for stroke prediction. The study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of Decision Tree (DT) and Random Forest (RF) classification algorithms, and it was found that the RF algorithm produced more accurate results compared to the DT algorithm.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%