1988
DOI: 10.1016/s0892-1997(88)80012-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strobovideolaryngoscopy in professional voice users: Results and clinical value

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
41
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Soft nodules are acute nodules and are usually translucent, soft and pliable compared to hard or chronic nodules that are firm whitish and thick. 35,36 All 3 patients who underwent surgery in our study were found to have hard nodules.…”
Section: Vhi10mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Soft nodules are acute nodules and are usually translucent, soft and pliable compared to hard or chronic nodules that are firm whitish and thick. 35,36 All 3 patients who underwent surgery in our study were found to have hard nodules.…”
Section: Vhi10mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…It is also extremely sensitive for the detection of paresis and paralyses of the vocal cords due to minimum laryngeal tumor [9,10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sataloff et al [9] analysed 1,876 laryngostroboscopic procedures performed over a 5-year period in ''professional voice users'' with dysphonia and known diagnosis. They found that in 29 % of patients the stroboscopy not only confirmed the existing diagnosis but also supplied additional diagnostic information, while in 18 % of patients the stroboscopy indicated that the existing diagnosis was incorrect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clinical utility of stroboscopy was established with initial studies of clinical utility 4 and diagnostic concordance. 5 Since that time, stroboscopy has been confirmed to be the recommended examination modality in the specialized evaluation of the dysphonic patient. 6 Notwithstanding, laryngeal stroboscopy contains many inherent weaknesses, including a dependence on regular phonation and minimum requisite phonation time of 2 seconds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%