2012 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2012
DOI: 10.1109/infcom.2012.6195817
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

STROBE: Actively securing wireless communications using Zero-Forcing Beamforming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
52
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to (12),p up is monotonically increasing with A 0 for any K and β. Therefore, p up can be analyzed via A 0 .…”
Section: Closed-form Expression For the Upper Bound For Ssopmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to (12),p up is monotonically increasing with A 0 for any K and β. Therefore, p up can be analyzed via A 0 .…”
Section: Closed-form Expression For the Upper Bound For Ssopmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact of inaccurate measurements is a general problem for adopting interference suppression techniques. Several implementations/testbed experiments have demonstrated the feasibility and robustness of applying interference management techniques in practical settings [20]- [22].…”
Section: Zero-forcing Precodingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, given α, the optimal w = P C maxŵ . b) Time Allocation: Similar to III-B2, β can be determined by substituting (17) into (12), when optimal w is selected. The optimal α can be determined by solving the following problem, when the optimal weights and β are selected.…”
Section: B) Overall Transmission Rate Of Susmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) Time Allocation: β can be determined by substituting (17) into (12), when the optimal w is selected. The PU selects α such that the SUs can achieve the expected transmission rate and in return the SUs make their best efforts to help the PU.…”
Section: B Cooperation Parameters Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation