Striving towards sustainable development: how environmental degradation and energy efficiency interact with health expenditures in SAARC countries

Abstract

The previous studies focused on environmental issues, identifying their root causes, urging prompt action to reduce environmental degradation. In this context, the current article extends the literature by incorporating the ecological impacts on the health sector and the role of sustainable development. The present study adds to the body of knowledge by examining the relationship between CO 2 emissions, sustainable development, energy efficiency, energy intensity, and health expenditures for SAARC countries from 2000 to 2020. Fully modified OLS (FMOLS) and dynamic OLS (DOLS) are used and diagnostic tests to check the association between the variables. The empirical analysis validated the long-run impact of the examined factors on health expenditures. The results show that energy efficiency and sustainable development have a statistically significant negative effect on health expenditures, vice-versa for CO 2 emission. Energy efficiency, energy intensity, and CO 2 emissions have been shown to have a one-way causative relationship with health expenditures, but sustainable development and economic growth have a two-way causation relationship. The better health status of the SAARC economies necessitates the establishment of long-term development strategies, environmental sustainability, and an examination of the energy sector. This work's conceptual and empirical advances have significant policy ramifications for this part of the globe and its efforts to improve sustainability.

Does Green Financing Develop a Cleaner Environment for Environmental Sustainability: Empirical Insights From Association of Southeast Asian Nations Economies

“…A further study indicated that the corporate social responsibility report published by different corporations, as observed during the pandemic of COVID-19, has a favorable link with investment in renewable energy projects. In agreement with previous research by Zhong et al (2022) , these findings support the hypothesis being advanced. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) reports emphasize the importance of environmental sustainability, so companies invest in renewable energy projects to reduce emissions of hazardous gasses and chemicals by recycling energy resources.…”

Assessing the impact of governance and health expenditures on carbon emissions in China: Role of environmental regulation

“…On the other hand, the level of carbon emissions creates health hazards that may impact public health and may have an effect on it; this may lead to increased healthcare costs. With this in mind, Zhang et al ( 98 ) performed an analysis to determine the carbon footprint of the health industry in Australia. They discovered that the use of renewable energy in the health industry in Australia resulted in a decrease of ~14% of the industry's overall carbon footprint.…”

The influence and mechanism of health expenditures on investment of financial assets decisions: A case study of China's economy

“…Health shocks tend to be better handled by households with access to microcredit than households without access to micro-credit. Zhong et al ( 6 ) investigated the long-run linkages between economic and financial risk in the MINT economies from 1984 to 2014. They employed the Wavelet analysis and found the one-way causal association from economic risk to financial risk for Mexico and financial risk to economic risk for Turkey.…”

“…It argues that large-scale sustainability transitions in transportation, energy, and agri-food socio-technical systems are required to address them (3). The multi-level perspective in this research stream hypothesizes sustainability alterations as green niche innovations battling against existing (unsound) systems and possibly substituting or reconfiguring these systems [e.g., (4)(5)(6)]. Health problems are on the rise as a result of an unsustainable environment (7).…”

“…As of 1960 and 1993, public funding in the United Kingdom was 85 and 86%, respectively. Health outcomes vary between countries for a variety of reasons, not only the amount of money spent on public health care ( 6 ). Aside from socio-economic variables, demographics, and health behaviors, these factors may also have a role.…”