2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103848
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Striving to translate shale physics across ten orders of magnitude: What have we learned?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 208 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, fine scale processes control the dynamics at a larger scale, while, concurrently, large-scale variables constraint the system response at the fine scale ( e.g. , through boundary conditions and/or forcing factors). Permeability alteration of shales due to precipitation and dissolution represent one such example, where chemical reaction at the micrometer/submicrometer scale can significantly alter effective properties of the rock at the millimeter/decimeter scale (bottom-up coupling); at the same time, permeability alterations affect the pressure field, the fluid distribution in the porous and network structures, the local velocity, as well as solute availability at subpore reactive interfaces (top-down coupling). Such two-way feedback mechanism across both spatial and temporal scales can dramatically affect and control the overall system behavior.…”
Section: Spatial Scaling Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, fine scale processes control the dynamics at a larger scale, while, concurrently, large-scale variables constraint the system response at the fine scale ( e.g. , through boundary conditions and/or forcing factors). Permeability alteration of shales due to precipitation and dissolution represent one such example, where chemical reaction at the micrometer/submicrometer scale can significantly alter effective properties of the rock at the millimeter/decimeter scale (bottom-up coupling); at the same time, permeability alterations affect the pressure field, the fluid distribution in the porous and network structures, the local velocity, as well as solute availability at subpore reactive interfaces (top-down coupling). Such two-way feedback mechanism across both spatial and temporal scales can dramatically affect and control the overall system behavior.…”
Section: Spatial Scaling Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, only empirical formula can be fitted to the data obtained from adjacent scale models to approximately express their uniaxial coupling. In future, it is anticipated that the complicated relationships and information integration between two adjacent scales could be assisted by machine learning to realize complete coupling (Mehmani et al, 2021).…”
Section: Multiscale Characterization Of Fluid Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, MPS methods may have difficulty capturing long-range and multiscale features [27][28][29]. This difficulty significantly impacts reconstruction of shale volumes due to the multiscale nature of shales [30]. Simulated-annealing methods incorporate multiple correlation functions and capture larger-scale features, but they can take hours or even days to generate large volumes [31,32].…”
Section: Synthesis Of Geologic Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%