Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance 2008
DOI: 10.1145/1509096.1509133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Striving for transparency and efficiency in e-government

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The objective of this paper is to examine the factor determining EGP adoption by Malaysian SMEs. The current study involved in the post introduction phase of e-government portal in Malaysia as earlier studies confirm that e-procurement in Malaysia was never accepted by the SMEs Eei et al (2012); Aman and Kasimin (2011), Kaliannan and Awang (2008); Colesca (2009); Kaliannan et al (2009); Lee et al (2008); Croom and Brandon-Jones (2007); George (2007); Salleh et al (2006); Chu et al (2004).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…The objective of this paper is to examine the factor determining EGP adoption by Malaysian SMEs. The current study involved in the post introduction phase of e-government portal in Malaysia as earlier studies confirm that e-procurement in Malaysia was never accepted by the SMEs Eei et al (2012); Aman and Kasimin (2011), Kaliannan and Awang (2008); Colesca (2009); Kaliannan et al (2009); Lee et al (2008); Croom and Brandon-Jones (2007); George (2007); Salleh et al (2006); Chu et al (2004).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Avoid unnecessary purchase / project (Achterstraat, 2011) Real time access information or real time bidding (Ndou, 2004) Automation of procurement process (Henriksen & Mahnke, 2005) Increase competition among the bidders or suppliers (Hanna, 2010;IMF, 2010;Mahmood, 2010;Thai 2001) Reduce human intervention in bidding process (Khanapuri et al, 2011;Magrini, 2006) Standardization enactment (More consistency in procurement phase) (UN, 2006;Zhang & Yang, 2011) Monitoring and tracking application (Achterstraat, 2011;ADB, 2010; Efficient and secure document transmission (AG, 2005;Chang, 2011;Hanna, 2010;Zhang & Yang, 2011) Managerial control and collaboration (Henriksen & Mahnke, 2005) Transparency and accountability (Croom & Brandon-Jones, 2005;Panda et al, 2010;Pathak et al, 2009;Vaidya et al, 2006) Make a procurement process faster and easier (Hanna, 2010) Obtain the best quality / price ratio (Kaliannan,Raman & Dorasamy, 2009;Lee,Oh & Kwon, 2008) Table 1: Public e-procurement anti-corruption factors Source: (Neupane, Soar, et al, 2012) There is limited research on ways to reduce corruption within public procurement. Vaidya et.al (2004) discussed twelve case studies and identified key benefits of public e-procurement in the Australian public sector based on the use of the Balanced Scorecard approach and critical success factors.…”
Section: Anti-corruption Factors Some Key Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%