Abstract:PurposeOver the last decade, value chain for development has shown its bias towards global value chain approaches. This article proposes a holistic framework to carry out feasibility analysis for the establishment of a value chain.Design/methodology/approachA qualitative research approach was used to collect and analyse data from a wide range of stakeholders potentially involved in establishment of a global cut-foliage value chain based on wild harvesting of ornamental ferns in New Caledonia.FindingsMultiple f… Show more
“…An enabling environment is defined as a set of policies, institutions, support services and other conditions that collectively create a business environment in which the chain functions and develops, influencing the chain actors' ability to participate (Christy et al, 2009; Trienekens, 2011). Enabling environment analysis focuses on crucial factors such as legislation, public capacities and services and socio‐cultural embeddedness that set boundaries to the value chain operation (Herman & Minh, 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As there is a growing consensus on importance of poor‐centred VCD interventions (Devaux et al, 2018; Rob & Cattaneo, 2021; Stoian et al, 2012; Werner et al, 2014), it is essential to explicitly pursue poverty reduction goals. It requires greater attention to the poor's needs and circumstances (Donovan et al, 2015; Herman & Minh, 2020; Stoian et al, 2012) and incorporation of rural development into VCD (Challies & Murray, 2011; Stoian & Donovan, 2020; Neilson & Shonk, 2014). In line with these contentions, this article argues that VCD requires an additional poor‐centred approach that directly reaches the poor, targets their meaningful participation and anchors on their livelihood diversity and capabilities.…”
Value chain for development (VCD) has increasingly been promoted for poverty reduction; yet, there is inadequate evidence on its effectiveness. Based on a comprehensive literature review, this article offers reasons why evidence on VCD impacts on poverty reduction is uncertain. It also suggests a conceptual framework for the poor-centred value chain for sustainable development to guide a better analysis of VCD participation and poverty impacts. The framework is particularly useful for researchers involved in research for development related projects in the VCD space.As it provides an analytical lens to understand the broader contextual situation of the poor, co-design solutions with multi-stakeholders and implement appropriate "fit-toneeds" strategies that ensure the poor benefits from their VCD participation. The article contributes to the existing VCD discourse by reflecting on the multidimensional nature and dynamism of poverty reduction, the poor's heterogeneity and their value chain readiness and VCD impacts on poverty.
“…An enabling environment is defined as a set of policies, institutions, support services and other conditions that collectively create a business environment in which the chain functions and develops, influencing the chain actors' ability to participate (Christy et al, 2009; Trienekens, 2011). Enabling environment analysis focuses on crucial factors such as legislation, public capacities and services and socio‐cultural embeddedness that set boundaries to the value chain operation (Herman & Minh, 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As there is a growing consensus on importance of poor‐centred VCD interventions (Devaux et al, 2018; Rob & Cattaneo, 2021; Stoian et al, 2012; Werner et al, 2014), it is essential to explicitly pursue poverty reduction goals. It requires greater attention to the poor's needs and circumstances (Donovan et al, 2015; Herman & Minh, 2020; Stoian et al, 2012) and incorporation of rural development into VCD (Challies & Murray, 2011; Stoian & Donovan, 2020; Neilson & Shonk, 2014). In line with these contentions, this article argues that VCD requires an additional poor‐centred approach that directly reaches the poor, targets their meaningful participation and anchors on their livelihood diversity and capabilities.…”
Value chain for development (VCD) has increasingly been promoted for poverty reduction; yet, there is inadequate evidence on its effectiveness. Based on a comprehensive literature review, this article offers reasons why evidence on VCD impacts on poverty reduction is uncertain. It also suggests a conceptual framework for the poor-centred value chain for sustainable development to guide a better analysis of VCD participation and poverty impacts. The framework is particularly useful for researchers involved in research for development related projects in the VCD space.As it provides an analytical lens to understand the broader contextual situation of the poor, co-design solutions with multi-stakeholders and implement appropriate "fit-toneeds" strategies that ensure the poor benefits from their VCD participation. The article contributes to the existing VCD discourse by reflecting on the multidimensional nature and dynamism of poverty reduction, the poor's heterogeneity and their value chain readiness and VCD impacts on poverty.
“…Lemeilleur et al, 2020;Poole and Donovan, 2014) and the sustainability literature more broadly (e.g. Herman and Thai, 2020) for both practitioners and academics. As sustainability is inherently an interdisciplinary field of study, we have drawn on research beyond the scope of coffee.…”
PurposeThe paper aims to understand the role of sensory quality scoring used at the competition auctions on pricing outcomes and how the auction process could be improved to increase sustainability in the specialty coffee market.Design/methodology/approachThe authors build a conceptual model explaining the potential role of sensory quality scoring in generating inequitable outcomes in specialty coffee auctions. The authors' research is exploratory. The authors base the propositions on the findings of the extant literature and our analysis of data from 24 Best of Panama (BOP) Auctions that took place between 2017 and 2021.FindingsA striking feature in recent BOP Auctions is a winner-takes-all (WTA) outcome. The authors also document the presence of significant price inversion. The authors attribute these outcomes to the interactions of information-poor producers, information-rich intermediaries and conspicuous consumers in competition auctions, where the product quality measurement is highly unreliable.Research limitations/implicationsData need to be gathered more broadly to enable the operationalization of the current propositions into testable hypotheses.Social implicationsThese strategies intend to provide guidelines for producers, consumers and other value chain participants on creating equitable solutions to a thriving industry where a WTA phenomenon occurs.Originality/valueThe current study is the first to argue that existing quality scoring practices, as well as conspicuous consumption, contribute to the inequities. Finally, the study proposes novel interventions to standardize the quality grading protocols and communicate them transparently to both producers and consumers.
“…One reason for this is that many interventions end at the piloting stage, with the assumption that scaling will occur spontaneously. For sustainable and inclusive innovation scaling to take place, an enabling environment is needed in which a set of conducive policies, informal institutions and support services bring together value chain actors in a cooperative manner (Herman and Minh 2021). Furthermore, many scaling efforts have overemphasized technical replication and reaching high numbers of end users, neglecting critical 'softer elements' ).…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.