2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2008.02.060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stripping efficiency and lifetime of carbon foils

Abstract: Charge-exchange injection by means of carbon foils is a widely used method in accelerators. This paper discusses two critical issues concerning the use of carbon foils: efficiency and lifetime. An energy scaling of stripping efficiency was suggested and compared with measurements. Several factors that determine the foil lifetime -energy deposition, heating, stress and buckling -were studied by using the simulation codes MARS and ANSYS.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…By using the past experimental data, the stripping efficiency is calculated to be 99.6% [5]. The primary stripper foil will be changed to a thickness of 290 g=cm 2 at the upgraded injection energy of 400 MeV, where the stripping efficiency is expected to be 99.7%, slightly better than the present one [6]. The remaining 0.4% or 0.3% of the unstripped beam is mostly partially stripped particles (single electron detachment) and thus it is neutral (uncharged) and is called H 0 beam.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…By using the past experimental data, the stripping efficiency is calculated to be 99.6% [5]. The primary stripper foil will be changed to a thickness of 290 g=cm 2 at the upgraded injection energy of 400 MeV, where the stripping efficiency is expected to be 99.7%, slightly better than the present one [6]. The remaining 0.4% or 0.3% of the unstripped beam is mostly partially stripped particles (single electron detachment) and thus it is neutral (uncharged) and is called H 0 beam.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…It is worth mentioning that an energy scaling of the crosssections by using 1=β 2 was proposed recently, where β is the relativistic factor of the H À ion [9]. Based on the 800 MeV measurement, an energy scaled cross-sections given for 200 MeV was shown to reproduced those measured ones at 200 MeV within a few percent errors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The dotted and dashed lines are also the same as the ones calculated for 181 MeV obtained by using energy scaled cross-sections of the previously measured data at 200 MeV [4] and 800 MeV [5], respectively. The energy scaling was done by using 1=β 2 hypothesis [9]. The σ À 11 cross-section was considered to be zero for the 200 MeV case as it was given a negative value and was also treated in the same way by the authors.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Koefisien daya henti hidrogen adalah 1.847 (MeV/(gram.cm 2 ) dan untuk elektron adalah 1.71 MeV/(gramcm 2 ). Koefisien panas jenis foil karbon adalah 0.165 cal/(gram-K) atau 0.6908 J/(gram-K) (8) .…”
Section: Perhitungan Tampang Lintang Reaksiunclassified
“…Kerapatan fraksi NH-, NHo dan NH+, untuk siklotron berenergi 13 MeV dapat dihitung dari persamaan (6), (7) dan (8). Gambar 1 memperlihatkan fraksi kerapatan NH-, NHo dan NH+, sebagai fungsi ketebalan foil.…”
Section: Gambar 2 Fraksi Kerapatan Nh- Nho Dan Nh+ Sebagai Fungsi Tunclassified