2001
DOI: 10.1002/srin.200100155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strip formation and process stability in twin roll strip casting

Abstract: Process stability in the thin strip casting process of steel has been investigated with a laboratory pilot caster. Depending on the steel grade and the process parameters irregular process states could be observed. It has been proved experimentally that the observed behaviour is not caused by the regulation system. Investigations of microsections on the cast strips have shown evidence of periodical changes in heat flux during solidification and strip formation as the reason for observed oscillating process var… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In some cases the backward metal flow may lead to buckling of solidified steel on roll surface, an irregular solidification rate and vibrations of the twin-roll caster. 43) The modified treatment of liquid steel provides smooth and uniform micro topography of the cast strip surface as shown in Fig. 15.…”
Section: Fig 11mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some cases the backward metal flow may lead to buckling of solidified steel on roll surface, an irregular solidification rate and vibrations of the twin-roll caster. 43) The modified treatment of liquid steel provides smooth and uniform micro topography of the cast strip surface as shown in Fig. 15.…”
Section: Fig 11mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thin slab casting process is similar to conventional slab casting by the common principle of the oscillating mould; casting velocity at a thickness ratio of about 4: 1 is higher. In this paper slab casting and twin roll casting (TRC) [3], figure 2, shall be compared; in both cases the mass flow of steel is the same by assumption, table 1.…”
Section: Comparison Of Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By reducing the main differences between slab and strip casting processes on • fluid dynamics • superheat • meniscus protection the consequences on SEN clogging, figure 3, and cleanness of aluminium killed low carbon steel shall be estimated.…”
Section: Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…116) The rate of deformation in the casting direction is dependent on many variables, 102) and may be greater in the backward direction than in the forward direction. 117) Too high a pressure causes excessive strip deformation and this is not desirable as it leads to segregation of lowmelting point elements that crystallize late in solidification.…”
Section: Strip Casting Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…88) Additionally the length of the deformation zone between the rolls increases with the roll diameter and this creates a more stable casting process. 102) However the upper diameter of the rolls is limited by the practicalities of designing a ceramic nozzle to deliver the melt. Additionally, the higher the diameter of the rolls the larger and more expensive are the ceramic side dams necessary for containing the melt.…”
Section: Strip Casting Processmentioning
confidence: 99%