2010
DOI: 10.1109/tvt.2010.2076320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

String-Stable CACC Design and Experimental Validation: A Frequency-Domain Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
445
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 741 publications
(452 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
5
445
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, some typical control schemes for CDS include the cooperative adaptive cruise control (CACC) design (Naus et al, 2010) which adopts the constant time-headway policy with the predecessor-follower information, and the sliding-mode control (Fernandes, 2012) with the leader-follower information. Wan et al (2016) have investigated how connected vehicles can obtain and utilize upcoming traffic signal information to manage their speed in advance in order to reduce fuel consumption and improve ride comfort by reducing idling at red lights.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, some typical control schemes for CDS include the cooperative adaptive cruise control (CACC) design (Naus et al, 2010) which adopts the constant time-headway policy with the predecessor-follower information, and the sliding-mode control (Fernandes, 2012) with the leader-follower information. Wan et al (2016) have investigated how connected vehicles can obtain and utilize upcoming traffic signal information to manage their speed in advance in order to reduce fuel consumption and improve ride comfort by reducing idling at red lights.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3) is a PD-based cooperative adaptive cruise controller (CACC) as the one in [21]. Its aim is to reduce the response time to different speed changes by using the communication link with its preceding vehicle.…”
Section: Longitudinal Dynamics Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, research into string stability has shown that ideal time headways are usually larger than the numbers that we found. For example, research on string stability by Naus et al [14] report on minimal time headways of 2.8s for ACC systems and 0.8s for CACC systems. These numbers are much bigger than our results for the safety controller.…”
Section: A Table Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Naus et al [14] thoroughly investigate the issue of string stability in platooning, with both ACC and CACC controllers. Their method includes several factors of delay in communication, but uncertainty of the information is not taken into account.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%