2008
DOI: 10.2178/jsl/1230396929
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strictly positive measures on Boolean algebras

Abstract: We investigate strictly positive finitely additive measures on Boolean algebras and strictly positive Radon measures on compact zerodimensional spaces.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It follows that P (L) is separable (see e.g. [7]), so when we transfer μ to a measure v on P (L) via the mapping L t → δ t ∈ P (L), the support of v is not separable though v lives on a separable space P (L).…”
Section: Corollary 32 If K Is Rosenthal Compact and Kmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It follows that P (L) is separable (see e.g. [7]), so when we transfer μ to a measure v on P (L) via the mapping L t → δ t ∈ P (L), the support of v is not separable though v lives on a separable space P (L).…”
Section: Corollary 32 If K Is Rosenthal Compact and Kmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Small σ-n-linked spaces supporting no measure. In [DP08] the authors claimed to prove that the space constructed by Todorčević does not support a measure. They were mainly interested in the corollary saying that there is a Boolean algebra of size add(N ) which does not support a measure.…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the Stone space of the measure algebra of the Lebesgue measure on [0, 1] satisfies (b) but not (a), while Talagrand [18] constructed under CH two examples showing that (c)⇒(b) and (e)⇒(c) do not hold. Recently, Džamonja and Plebanek [2] gave a ZFC counterexample to (c)⇒(b). In this paper we provide a ZFC example of a compact space K witnessing that the implication (e)⇒(c) does not hold, i.e.…”
Section: It Is Known That the Following Implications Hold (A) =⇒ (B) mentioning
confidence: 99%