2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11117-017-0540-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strict K-monotonicity and K-order continuity in symmetric spaces

Abstract: This paper is devoted to strict K -monotonicity and K -order continuity in symmetric spaces. Using a local approach to the geometric structure in a symmetric space E we investigate a connection between strict K -monotonicity and global convergence in measure of a sequence of the maximal functions. Next, we solve an essential problem whether an existence of a point of K -order continuity in a symmetric space E on [0, ∞) implies that the embedding E → L 1 [0, ∞) does not hold. We present a complete characterizat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(61 reference statements)
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, the Lorentz space E endowed with the given norm is strictly K-monotone, whence x is an LKM point in E. Assume that (y n ) ⊂ E, y n ≺ x for any n ∈ N and y n E → x E . Then, since x is an LKM point and x * (∞) = 0, by Theorem 3.2 in [9] it follows that y * n → x * globally in measure. Therefore, by property 2.11 in [17] we get y * n (t) → x * (t) for all t ∈ [0, 1].…”
Section: Lower and Upper Local Uniform K-monotonicity In Symmetric Spmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, the Lorentz space E endowed with the given norm is strictly K-monotone, whence x is an LKM point in E. Assume that (y n ) ⊂ E, y n ≺ x for any n ∈ N and y n E → x E . Then, since x is an LKM point and x * (∞) = 0, by Theorem 3.2 in [9] it follows that y * n → x * globally in measure. Therefore, by property 2.11 in [17] we get y * n (t) → x * (t) for all t ∈ [0, 1].…”
Section: Lower and Upper Local Uniform K-monotonicity In Symmetric Spmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The crucial inspiration for our discussion was found in paper [7], where there has been studied an application of strict K-monotonicity and K-order continuity to the best dominated approximation with respect to the Hardy-Littlewood-Pólya relation ≺. It is worth mentioning that in view of the previous result, in [9] there has been investigated, among others, a full criteria for K-order continuity in symmetric spaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, in view of Lemma 2.5 in [8] we obtain y * (∞) = 0. In consequence, since y ∈ S E , by (20) and (22) as well as by assumption that E is strictly K-monotone, in view of Theorem 1 in [6] we conclude that (23) y * * n → y * * and x * * n → y * * globally in measure. Now, since E d is compactly fully k-rotund and strictly Kmonotone, by Theorem 4.9 we have E is upper locally uniformly K-monotone.…”
Section: Fully K-rotunditymentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Assume that ψ is the fundamental function of the associate space E ′ of a symmetric space E. (i) ⇒ (iii). Immediately, by Lemma 2.5 in[8] and Lemma 3.1 and Remark 3.2 we get E is K-order continuous and φ(∞) = ∞.Hence, by Corollary 2 in[6] and by Remark 3.2 it follows that E is order continuous and E ′ ֒→ {f : f * (∞) = 0}. (ii) ⇒ (i).…”
mentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation