2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaac.2013.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Striatum-Based Circuitry of Adolescent Depression and Anhedonia

Abstract: Objective Striatum-based circuits have been implicated in both major depressive disorder (MDD) and anhedonia, a symptom that reflects deficits of reward processing. Yet adolescents with MDD often exhibit a wide range of anhedonia severity. Addressing this clinical phenomenon, we aimed to use intrinsic functional connectivity (iFC) to study striatum-based circuitry in relation to categorical diagnosis of MDD and anhedonia severity. Method A total of 21 psychotropic medication–free adolescents with MDD and 21 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
173
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 194 publications
(197 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
13
173
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, recent work in depression (Pizzagalli et al, 2005(Pizzagalli et al, , 2009Gabbay et al, 2013), and our own work in schizophrenia (Wolf et al, 2014) suggests the merit of investigating more specific components of psychopathology such as anhedonia (Treadway and Zald, 2011), amotivation, or irritability (Stringaris et al, 2009) rather than overall depression severity. While in this study we did not find a specific relationship between reward system dysfunction and anhedonia-related items on the BDI, more detailed assessments might be more sensitive; the truncated range of anhedonia items from the BDI used here may have limited detection power.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Finally, recent work in depression (Pizzagalli et al, 2005(Pizzagalli et al, , 2009Gabbay et al, 2013), and our own work in schizophrenia (Wolf et al, 2014) suggests the merit of investigating more specific components of psychopathology such as anhedonia (Treadway and Zald, 2011), amotivation, or irritability (Stringaris et al, 2009) rather than overall depression severity. While in this study we did not find a specific relationship between reward system dysfunction and anhedonia-related items on the BDI, more detailed assessments might be more sensitive; the truncated range of anhedonia items from the BDI used here may have limited detection power.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Specifically, given prior research relating anhedonia to reward system dysfunction in multiple psychiatric disorders (Juckel et al, 2006;Wolf, 2006;Harvey et al, 2007;Wolf et al, 2008;Pizzagalli et al, 2009;Treadway and Zald, 2011;Gabbay et al, 2013;Hägele et al, 2014) anhedonia was examined using a sub-set of anhedonia-related items from the BDI (Joiner et al, 2003). Furthermore, we similarly examined the relationship with BDI items unrelated to anhedonia.…”
Section: Supplementary Analyses Of Additional Symptom Dimensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The VS has long been implicated in the processing of both rewarding and aversive stimuli and decreased BOLD response within the VS has been identified as a putative biological marker for vulnerability to substance use in adolescents (Peters et al, 2011). Similarly, data implicate the DS in the neurobiology of both mood-and substance-related disorders (Vollstadt-Klein et al, 2010;Hyatt et al, 2012;Dager et al, 2013;Gabbay et al, 2013;Tomasi and Volkow, 2013;Xu et al, 2014). The DS is further involved in reward-related learning and is thought to have a role in substance misuse and addictions relapse (Everitt and Robbins, 2005;Volkow et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, as in previous studies, we recruited BD II and NOS participants early in their illness course and before significant clinical intervention (Chandler et al, 2009;Yip et al, 2013;Godlewska et al, 2014;Yip et al, 2014). A limitation of this methodology is that it inherently excludes very severe cases and may therefore underestimate the magnitude of observed effects.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%