The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2012
DOI: 10.1007/s13394-012-0050-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stretching student teachers’ understanding of fractions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conceptually, fractions present a hurdle as students attempt to transfer their understanding of whole numbers to a new but related class of numbers. Several researchers (Mack 2001;Lamon 2007) and, more recently, Harvey (2012) showed us that fractions are a problematic area of learning for both students and their teachers. Investigations conducted by Tirosh (2000) showed that pre-service teachers tended to have a mechanical understanding of fractions and this knowledge is less likely to help them support their students develop conceptual knowledge that girds fraction problems that involve division.…”
Section: Pre-service Understanding Of Fractions and Misconceptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conceptually, fractions present a hurdle as students attempt to transfer their understanding of whole numbers to a new but related class of numbers. Several researchers (Mack 2001;Lamon 2007) and, more recently, Harvey (2012) showed us that fractions are a problematic area of learning for both students and their teachers. Investigations conducted by Tirosh (2000) showed that pre-service teachers tended to have a mechanical understanding of fractions and this knowledge is less likely to help them support their students develop conceptual knowledge that girds fraction problems that involve division.…”
Section: Pre-service Understanding Of Fractions and Misconceptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research supports the idea that teaching and learning fraction concepts is a difficult and complex undertaking (Ball, ; Harvey, ; Lamon, ; Ma, ; Newton, ). Charalambous and Pitta‐Pantazi () and Harvey () assert that the teaching and learning of fractions has traditionally been problematic while Newstead and Murray () suggest that it is well documented that fractions are among the most complex mathematical concepts that elementary students encounter. Further research reveals that there are several factors that contribute to students' challenges with developing deep conceptual understanding of and procedural fluency with fractions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 62%
“…According to the literature, either the challenge of learning fractions with deep understanding lies in the inherent nature of fractions and the multifaceted construct of fractions or it is due to the instructional approaches for teaching fractions that are employed by teachers (e.g., Behr, Harel, Post, & Lesh, ; Brousseau, Brousseau, & Warfield, ; Cramer & Whitney, ; Kieren, ; Lamon, ; McNamara & Shaughnessy, ). Many purport that the problem is the confluence of these factors and that the problem is further complicated by the fact that many prospective and in‐service teachers have a limited and incomplete understanding of fractions themselves (Ball, ; Becker & Lin, ; Chinnappan & Forrester, ; Cramer, Post, & del Mas, ; Harvey, ; Ma, ; Wu, ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, students determined a fraction was lesser if the difference between the numerator and denominator was less (e.g., 35 is less than 110 because 2 [i.e., difference of 3 and 5] is less than 9 [i.e., difference of 1 and 10]). Harvey (2012) also noted this same thinking with a university‐level preservice educator. As Nelson and Powell (2018) explained with fraction computation, elementary students separately added all of the digits in an addition problem to reach the solution (e.g., the student answer 13 + 14 = 9, as the student added 1 + 1 + 3 + 4), which provides another example of students applying natural number knowledge to fractions.…”
Section: Rational Number Error Patternsmentioning
confidence: 73%