2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.cplett.2005.07.118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stretching siloxanes: An ab initio molecular dynamics study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

3
44
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
44
1
Order By: Relevance
“…and a fictitious electron mass of 400 a.u. In a previous study on isolated siloxanes, [17] we did not observe radical formation during bond rupture in any of the simulations. We have performed a complete simulation using the spin restricted BLYP functional [25,26] to follow the evolution of the system after rupture.…”
Section: Car-parrinello Simulations Of the Rupture Of Siloxanescontrasting
confidence: 45%
“…and a fictitious electron mass of 400 a.u. In a previous study on isolated siloxanes, [17] we did not observe radical formation during bond rupture in any of the simulations. We have performed a complete simulation using the spin restricted BLYP functional [25,26] to follow the evolution of the system after rupture.…”
Section: Car-parrinello Simulations Of the Rupture Of Siloxanescontrasting
confidence: 45%
“…For example, in the force-modulation measurement 2 where a sinusoidal force signal ͑i.e., ac signal͒ of small amplitude is augmented to the constant-rate input signal and applied to drive the cantilever, the modulation frequency is limited to relatively low frequency range ͑a couple of hundreds of hertz͒ and the modulation amplitude is small ͑several tens of nanometers͒. Rapid broadband viscoelasticity measurement is needed to measure ratedependent phenomena, 3 particularly when dynamic evolution of the sample is of interest. 4 The low speed of SPM is because at high speeds, the SPM measurement of material response can suffer from large uncertainties due to the convolution of adverse effects such as hysteresis and dynamics of the piezoactuator, dynamics of the probe, the mechanical mounting, etc., into the measured data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scanning probe microscope (SPM) has become an enabling tool to quantitatively measure the mechanical properties of a wide variety of materials [2]. Current SPMbased force measurements, however, are limited by the slow operation of SPM to measure the rate-dependent phenomena of materials [3], and large measurement (temporal) errors can be generated when dynamic evolution of the material is involved during the measurement. Operating speed of current SPMs is limited by: (1) the excitation force applied, which is either quasi-static or resonant-oscillation based, is either too narrow-banded in frequency (quasi-static) or too slow (resonant oscillation based) to rapidly excite the nanomechanical behavior of materials over a broad frequency band; and (2) the hardware adverse effects can be coupled into the measured data if the measurement is at high-speed and over a broad frequency range.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%