2015
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.5b01613
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stretchable, Transparent, Ultrasensitive, and Patchable Strain Sensor for Human–Machine Interfaces Comprising a Nanohybrid of Carbon Nanotubes and Conductive Elastomers

Abstract: PSS). This sensor, which can detect small strains on human skin, was created using environmentally benign water-based solution processing. We attributed the tunability of strain sensitivity (i.e., gauge factor), stability, and optical transparency to enhanced formation of percolating networks between conductive SWCNTs and PEDOT phases at interfaces in the stacked PU-PEDOT:PSS/SWCNT/PU-PEDOT:PSS structure. The mechanical stability, high stretchability of up to 100%, optical transparency of 62%, and gauge factor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
560
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 841 publications
(574 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
3
560
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The gauge factor is higher than that of the hydrogel without electronic conductor (from 0.09 at 100% strain to 0.53 at 1000% strain), and other piezoresistive electronic strain sensor (0.06 at 200% strain)8 and capacitive soft strain sensors based on ionic conductor (0.348 ± 0.11 at 700% strain) 20. Although some strain sensors exhibit much higher gauge factors, the poor stretchability and lack of self‐healing capability restrict their applications under rigorous mechanical deformations 47, 48, 49…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gauge factor is higher than that of the hydrogel without electronic conductor (from 0.09 at 100% strain to 0.53 at 1000% strain), and other piezoresistive electronic strain sensor (0.06 at 200% strain)8 and capacitive soft strain sensors based on ionic conductor (0.348 ± 0.11 at 700% strain) 20. Although some strain sensors exhibit much higher gauge factors, the poor stretchability and lack of self‐healing capability restrict their applications under rigorous mechanical deformations 47, 48, 49…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wearable strain sensors based on the disconnection (sliding) have been fabricated in a number of ways such as depositing AuNPs onto PDMS, [115] embedding AgNWs into PDMS, [111] electrospinning Au nanotroughs onto PDMS, [116] mixing SWCNTs with self-healing hydrogel, [117] sandwiching SWCNTs between two PU-PEDOT:PSS electrodes, [46] aligning CNTs onto a substrate, [53,118] growing well-aligned ZnO NWs on the textile substrate, [119] laser-scribing graphene coated on PET substrate, [113] encapsulating graphene-nanocellulose nanopaper in PDMS, [51] and infusing graphene into rubber. [120] Tensile strain can decrease the overlapped area between nanomaterials and decrease the number of conductive pathways, leading to an increase in resistance.…”
Section: Resistive Strain Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[18,[33][34][35] To fabricate the wearable sensors, conventional lithographic processes can be extended to pattern nanomaterials. [23,[36][37][38] Solution based processing methods such as spray coating, [25,39,40] drop casting, [41][42][43][44][45] spin coating, [46,47] dip coating, [48] vacuum filtration, [49][50][51] and layer-by-layer assembly [52] were commonly used for fabrication of nanomaterial-based sensors. Direct spinning of CNTs onto a substrate or into yarns [53][54][55] and electrospinning of nanofibers or NWs were reported to produce fiber-like nanomaterials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Recent research has developed to bio-related applications, such as strain sensors for artificial skins. 16 In spite of the broad current and future applications, the fundamental mechanics of lamellar nanomaterials has not yet been well elucidated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%