2020
DOI: 10.1039/d0ma00032a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stretchable and calibratable graphene sensors for accurate strain measurement

Abstract: A stretchable and calibratable graphene sensor for accurate strain measurement.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(66 reference statements)
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The gauge factor (( R – R o )/ R o /strain) is often utilized to characterize the sensitivity of strain sensors. The 1st and 6th curves of ( R – R o )/ R o vs stretching strain (30% strain) in Figure d were fitted via a polynomial method . Both coefficients of determination ( R 2 ) for the two fitted plots were 0.999 (Figure S2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The gauge factor (( R – R o )/ R o /strain) is often utilized to characterize the sensitivity of strain sensors. The 1st and 6th curves of ( R – R o )/ R o vs stretching strain (30% strain) in Figure d were fitted via a polynomial method . Both coefficients of determination ( R 2 ) for the two fitted plots were 0.999 (Figure S2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 1st and 6th curves of (R − R o )/R o vs stretching strain (30% strain) in Figure 4d were fitted via a polynomial method. 41 Both coefficients of determination (R 2 ) for the two fitted plots were 0.999 (Figure S2). The calculated gauge factor was 5−42 for the 1st stretching−sensing curve and 10−34 for the stabilized curve (6th).…”
Section: ■ Experimental Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the GF is the gradient of the sensitivity function, it can be represented as the first derivative of the fitted function. 46 The fitted function with (R 2 ) = 0.999 for the sensitivity graph in Figure 8A is found to be a fourth-order polynomial function:…”
Section: Sensing Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…[4][5][6][7]49 This leads to the network slipping easily (by debonding), which is considered the major sensing mechanism of the graphene network strain sensors, i.e., a change of contact resistance. [4][5][6][7][8]50 The varying level of interfacial adhesion and different number of graphene layers in such systems also explain the different gauge factors reported. 5,10−16 Although higher sensitivity can be achieved by employing thinner graphene with a higher G i as demonstrated in this work, the strong adhesion leads to graphene fracturing easily.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Well-bonded graphene on a target is considered to deliver better sensitivity (higher strain gradient) and higher resolution as compared to a debonded counterpart. As shown in Figure a, monolayer graphene may be preferred due to its higher ε bond c that allows high sensitivity to be achieved over a relatively large working strain range. , This explains the mechanism of the aforementioned graphene network strain sensor well, where the multilayer graphene structure (large N ) and poor interfacial adhesion (low τ i and G i ) result in a low value of ε bond c . , This leads to the network slipping easily (by debonding), which is considered the major sensing mechanism of the graphene network strain sensors, i.e., a change of contact resistance. , The varying level of interfacial adhesion and different number of graphene layers in such systems also explain the different gauge factors reported. , Although higher sensitivity can be achieved by employing thinner graphene with a higher G i as demonstrated in this work, the strong adhesion leads to graphene fracturing easily. After interfacial debonding over a craze, the maximum strain increases rapidly as the craze opens (Figure b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%