Stressor-Specific Sex Differences in Amygdala–Frontal Cortex Networks

Abstract

Females and males differ in stress reactivity, coping, and the prevalence rates of stress-related disorders. According to a neurocognitive framework of stress coping, the functional connectivity between the amygdala and frontal regions (including the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC), ventral anterior cingulate cortex (vACC), and medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC)) plays a key role in how people deal with stress. In the current study, we investigated the effects of sex and stressor type in a within-subject counterbalanced design on the resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) of the amygdala and these frontal regions in 77 healthy participants (40 females). Both stressor types led to changes in subjective ratings, with decreasing positive affect and increasing negative affect and anger. Females showed higher amygdala–vACC and amygdala–mPFC rsFC for social exclusion than for achievement stress, and compared to males. Whereas a higher amygdala–vACC rsFC indicates the activation of emotion processing and coping, a higher amygdala–mPFC rsFC indicates feelings of reward and social gain, highlighting the positive effects of social affiliation. Thus, for females, feeling socially affiliated might be more fundamental than for males. Our data indicate interactions of sex and stressor in amygdala–frontal coupling, which translationally contributes to a better understanding of the sex differences in prevalence rates and stress coping.

Caregiver or Playmate? Fathers’ and mothers’ brain responses to ball-play with children

“…Our design cannot conclusively tease apart these competing interpretations. Most previous literature suggests that females, relative to males, attend more closely to social cues (Su et al, 2009), as also evidenced by their physiological reactivity (Benenson et al, 2013) and amygdala-frontal network activity (Bürger et al, 2023) following exclusion. Accordingly, mothers' elevated sensitivity to inclusion in our study aligns with these gender-dependent patterns.…”

Addressing the gender paradox: Effective suicide prevention strategies for women

“…For example, females’ brain circuits exhibit unique patterns of activity in response to stress, particularly in regions such as amygdala-frontal network (i.e., the ventral anterior cingulate cortex and the medial prefrontal cortex specifically) during social-exclusion stress compared to males, which suggests that females may have stronger activation in these regions under stress, particularly social stress. 5 However, there are still more underlying molecular foundations that have not been fully explored. 6 Additionally, how different stages of a female’s life affect her biological and neuroscientific responses to life events still remains underexplored.…”

Testosterone and the Amygdala’s Functional Connectivity in Women and Men

“…Participants were asked to refrain from exercise or alcohol consumption (24 h prior to the measurements), medication, caffeine and drug intake (on the test day), and food and drink other than water (for two hours before the measurements). Upon arrival, participants were asked for subjective mood ratings (positive and negative affect scale, PANAS) [51] and to provide saliva samples for hormone analyses (approximately 15 min after arrival) (see also [30,[52][53][54]). Furthermore, participants completed questionnaires on personality (NEO-FFI, [55]) and social gender roles (BSRI, [56]).…”