2003
DOI: 10.1002/jclp.10203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stressful events, appraisal, coping and recurrent headache*

Abstract: One hundred fourteen headache sufferers recorded their headaches, stressful events, appraisal processes, and coping responses over a 28 day period. Stressful events were found to precede headache attacks more often than periods of headache freedom. Primary appraisals (how much the event mattered), levels of affective regulation coping and ratings of emotional upset were all higher for stressful events that were not associated with subsequent headache. Stressful events occurring during headache were followed by… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
3

Year Published

2003
2003
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
10
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…22 This finding supports previous research that has consistently found an association between the perception of stress as measured by daily hassles and headaches. 2,7 Consistent with these earlier studies, 2,7 the current investigation also found that the greater the number of hassles reported predicted higher headache frequency, duration, and intensity. These findings suggest that chronic headache sufferers' appraisal of these daily annoyances as stressful may impact headache activity.…”
Section: Commentssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…22 This finding supports previous research that has consistently found an association between the perception of stress as measured by daily hassles and headaches. 2,7 Consistent with these earlier studies, 2,7 the current investigation also found that the greater the number of hassles reported predicted higher headache frequency, duration, and intensity. These findings suggest that chronic headache sufferers' appraisal of these daily annoyances as stressful may impact headache activity.…”
Section: Commentssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Factor analyses generally differentiate distinct sets of problem-focused (e.g., making a plan of action and following it) and emotion-focused (e.g., distancing) factors. The WOC has been widely used to examine the personal and situational concomitants of coping and to (Marlowe, 1998) and the Utrecht Coping List (Franken, Hendriks, Haffmans, & van der Meer, 2001). Carver and associates (Carver & Scheier, 1994;Carver et al, 1989) developed a situational measure to complement their dispositional measure of coping by asking individuals what they thought or did in a specific stressful encounter.…”
Section: Concepts Of Coping Responses or Skillsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent neuroimaging studies have shown that the external stimuli activate the human arousal state and elicit passive attention (15), therefore the high baseline arousal found in TTH as well as in migraine (16) might indicate a passive attention deficit in these primary headaches. On the other hand, based on previous findings that more stresses from common daily activities were perceived by patients suffering from CTTH compared with those from migraine (3,(17)(18)(19)(20)(21), we have hypothesized that the deficit of passive attention would be more severe in CTTH. In the current study design, the single-tone elicited P3 would be more reduced in this headache type than in migraine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%