Stress Testing the Resuscitation Room: Latent Threats to Patient Safety Identified During Interprofessional In Situ Simulation in a Canadian Academic Emergency Department

Abstract

ObjectivesEmergency department (ED) resuscitation is a complex, high‐stakes procedure where positive outcomes depend on effective interactions between the health care team, the patient, and the environment. Resuscitation teams work in dynamic environments and strive to ensure the timely delivery of necessary treatments, equipment, and skill sets when required. However, systemic failures in this environment cannot always be adequately anticipated, which exposes patients to opportunities for harm. MethodsAs part of a new interprofessional education and quality improvement initiative, this prospective, observational study sought to characterize latent safety threats (LSTs) identified during the delivery of in situ, simulated resuscitations in our ED. In situ simulation (ISS) sessions were delivered on a monthly basis in the EDs at each campus of a large tertiary care academic hospital system, during which a variety of scenarios were run with teams of ED health care professionals. LSTs were identified by simulation facilitators and participants during the case and debriefing and then grouped thematically for analysis. ResultsDuring the study period, 22 ISS sessions were delivered, involving 58 cases and reaching 383 ED health care professionals. 196 latent safety threats were identified through these sessions (mean = 3.4 LSTs per case) of which 110 were determined to be “actionable” at a system level. LSTs identified included system/environmental design flaws, equipment problems, failures in department processes, and knowledge/skill gaps. Corrective mechanisms were initiated in 85% of actionable cases.ConclusionsEffective quality improvement and continuing education programs are essential to translate these findings into more resilient patient care. ISS, beyond its role as a training tool for developing intrinsic and crisis resource management skills, can be effectively used to identify system issues in the ED that could expose critically ill patients to harm.

Preparing for a COVID-19 pandemic: a review of operating room outbreak response measures in a large tertiary hospital in Singapore

“…In situ simulation is simulation training that takes place in the actual clinical environment. It has been used to improve reliability and safety in high-risk or high-stress environments, [40][41][42] and has been shown to improve clinical skills, teamwork, patient safety, and behaviour. 43 We conducted a series of simulations and ''walk-throughs'' of various scenarios with different surgical disciplines.…”

Faculty Sim: Implementation of an Innovative, Simulation‐based Continuing Professional Development Curriculum for Academic Emergency Physicians

“…This consisted of consultations and information gathering from department leaders, patient safety incident reports, morbidity and mortality rounds, and observational data from our in situ simulation program. 12 Based on these data, we created a survey to all department members to identify and prioritize educational needs. Next, we conducted focus groups with local experts to identify themes best addressed through simulation (step 3) and to create a broad outline of goals and objectives.…”

Perioperative care of pediatric anesthesia for children with suspected or confirmed COVID-19

“… Drills are essential for testing the preparedness of our isolation OR and procedures[ 21 22 ] Drills should take place in the actual OR to improve safety in high-risk stressful situations[ 21 22 23 ] Drills should show how to improve teamwork, patient safety, and behavior through conducting a series of simulations of various scenarios[ 24 ] The final scenario should involve a crisis that requires the participants to perform resuscitation while wearing PPEs and PAPRs. …”

“…Drills should take place in the actual OR to improve safety in high-risk stressful situations[ 21 22 23 ]…”