2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stress-strain synchronization for high strain rate tests on brittle composites

Abstract: Nowadays, many researchers develop rate-dependent composite material models for application in dynamic simulations. Ideally, full stress-strain curves at a wide range of strain rates are available for identification of the different parameters of these models. Dynamic tensile tests are needed to produce the experimental input data. However, especially for brittle materials, the data acquisition during these tests becomes critical. The effect of synchronization on the test results is investigated by conducting … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This deviation is partly due to the difference between the samples and materials used in our study and in other cases in the literature, and partly to the homogenization calculation of the parameters which only provides a rough estimate for a layered medium when starting from the unidirectional ply parameters. This is conform with recent literature reports [11,37] where the inverted stiffness parameters (C 12 , C 13 and C 23 ) were found to be almost 2.5 times higher than homogenized stiffness values, and also in line with the information coming from different manufacturers stating that the deviation in material properties (which were used as the basis for the homogenization calculation) might amount up to 10%. In order to validate the accuracy of the inversion results, the SAFE-based calculated wavenumber-frequency pairs corresponding to the optimized stiffness parameters of full-field motion inversion (red dots) are plotted in Figure 8, together with the MPDM-based extracted values from the experimental recordings (black open circles) and the experimentally obtained dispersion curves obtained through the 2D FFT of the star-like gridded laser Doppler vibrometer data, transforming (x, t; θ) data into (k, f ; θ).…”
Section: Effect Of Noisesupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This deviation is partly due to the difference between the samples and materials used in our study and in other cases in the literature, and partly to the homogenization calculation of the parameters which only provides a rough estimate for a layered medium when starting from the unidirectional ply parameters. This is conform with recent literature reports [11,37] where the inverted stiffness parameters (C 12 , C 13 and C 23 ) were found to be almost 2.5 times higher than homogenized stiffness values, and also in line with the information coming from different manufacturers stating that the deviation in material properties (which were used as the basis for the homogenization calculation) might amount up to 10%. In order to validate the accuracy of the inversion results, the SAFE-based calculated wavenumber-frequency pairs corresponding to the optimized stiffness parameters of full-field motion inversion (red dots) are plotted in Figure 8, together with the MPDM-based extracted values from the experimental recordings (black open circles) and the experimentally obtained dispersion curves obtained through the 2D FFT of the star-like gridded laser Doppler vibrometer data, transforming (x, t; θ) data into (k, f ; θ).…”
Section: Effect Of Noisesupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The only option is to analyse the delay of each component in the chain of data acquisition to allow for an automatic synchronization [6]. Both the start or the end of the test are namely not discrete enough at high speed to be used to accurately align the data streams.…”
Section: Results and Stress-strain Synchronizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To estimate the strain rate of rectangular specimens even before testing, the nominal strain rate . ε nom is defined as quotient of the target test speed v 0 and the free clamping length of the test specimen l 0 , according to Equation (2) [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quasi-static as well as high strain rate testing (up to 6000 s −1 in Split Hopkinson Bar testing) are deeply investigated research areas (e.g., [9][10][11][12]). A gap appears in short-term dynamic tensile tests on cFRTP materials in a medium strain rate spectrum (1 to 100 s −1 ) for which only isolated preliminary work exists [6,8,13]. This strain rate area is addressed in this work, forming the basis of a cFRTP test method necessary for material applications, e.g., in the automotive sector [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation