2019
DOI: 10.1111/ffe.13134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stress–strain curves of metallic materials and post‐necking strain hardening characterization: A review

Abstract: For metallic materials, standard uniaxial tensile tests with round bar specimens or flat specimens only provide accurate equivalent stress–strain curve before diffuse necking. However, for numerical modelling of problems where very large strains occur, such as plastic forming and ductile damage and fracture, understanding the post‐necking strain hardening behaviour is necessary. Also, welding is a highly complex metallurgical process, and therefore, weldments are susceptible to material discontinuities, flaws,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
65
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
65
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 19 ] The uniform elongation was determined as the engineering strain corresponding to the maximum tensile stress, and the total elongation was determined as the elongation of the original gauge length of the tensile specimen at a fracture. [ 20 ] These elongations as well as the yield and tensile strengths of all steel grades were higher than the total elongation guaranteed by the manufacturer.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…[ 19 ] The uniform elongation was determined as the engineering strain corresponding to the maximum tensile stress, and the total elongation was determined as the elongation of the original gauge length of the tensile specimen at a fracture. [ 20 ] These elongations as well as the yield and tensile strengths of all steel grades were higher than the total elongation guaranteed by the manufacturer.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…A standard procedure for the determination of trues stress and the true strain was used: = (1 + ), = (1 + ), where and are true stress and true strain, respectively, and are engineering stress and engineering strain, respectively. This approach is correct if the specimen deforms uniformly without neck formation [30,31]. In situ observations of the specimens during high-temperature tensile deformation showed that at elongations lower than 300% (~1.4), specimens deformed uniformly.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The slight advantage of FepiM is expected, as it explicitly considers the temperature inhomogeneity in the specimen and that is captured only in an average sense in the analytical methods [10]. Additionally, flow curves with several recrystallization cycles are reproduced well, which is difficult to achieve using conventional inverse modeling based on flow curve equations [5]. Finally, the FepiM approach proved to be more versatile than other piecewise approaches like IFD [16], as it was successfully applied to compression tests where a strain measurement inside the specimen using DIC is impossible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cao et al [15] recently determined flow curves beyond necking from tensile test experiments by optimizing parameters of a modified Swift constitutive law. However, the accuracy of these models highly depends on the a priori chosen constitutive model [5]. In addition, flow curve description for materials exhibiting complex flow behavior like multiple dynamic recrystallization cycles cannot typically be captured by these models.…”
Section: Inverse Methods For Isothermal Flow Curve Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation