2003
DOI: 10.1067/mse.2003.22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stress shielding and bone resorption in shoulder arthroplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
285
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 600 publications
(322 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
6
285
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The first such problem includes incompatibility of mechanical properties of metallic alloys and natural bone; for example, metal alloys have greater elastic modulus to that of bone [8,9]. Under in vivo conditions, the mechanical mismatch between bone and implants leads to clinical phenomena called stress shielding [10,11]. In stress shielding, the implant carries much of the bulk load and the surrounding bone tissue experiences a reduced load stress.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first such problem includes incompatibility of mechanical properties of metallic alloys and natural bone; for example, metal alloys have greater elastic modulus to that of bone [8,9]. Under in vivo conditions, the mechanical mismatch between bone and implants leads to clinical phenomena called stress shielding [10,11]. In stress shielding, the implant carries much of the bulk load and the surrounding bone tissue experiences a reduced load stress.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In stress shielding, the implant carries much of the bulk load and the surrounding bone tissue experiences a reduced load stress. This triggers the resorption of surrounding bone tissue [11]. To address this problem, permanent metallic alloys such as Co-Cr-Mo and Ti-6Al-4V have been manufactured into porous forms to reduce the modulus mismatch with natural bone [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one study, 9% of patients had a major reduction in cortical thickness in the proximolateral region of the humeral stem after shoulder arthroplasty at an average followup of 5.3 years [10]. Of the patients in that study [10], five of six with cortical thinning had rheumatoid arthritis. In our case, the entire humerus was spanned with interlocking implants in a patient with preexisting osteoporosis because our primary concern was fracture between components.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is characterized by bone remodeling according to Wolff's Law as the stressors on the bone are changed with the introduction of an implant [1]. In one study, 9% of patients had a major reduction in cortical thickness in the proximolateral region of the humeral stem after shoulder arthroplasty at an average followup of 5.3 years [10]. Of the patients in that study [10], five of six with cortical thinning had rheumatoid arthritis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Raiss et al described a very low revision rate with all humeral components but did describe radiographic evidence of stress shielding in as many as 82.5% of traditional humeral components [7]. The diaphyseal portion of a humeral stem serves to transfer some of the load away from the proximal humerus and can generate osteopenia [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%