2020
DOI: 10.7755/fb.118.3.8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stress response and postrelease mortality of blacktip sharks (Carcharhinus limbatus) captured in shore-based and charter-boat-based recreational fisheries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(100 reference statements)
4
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The estimate of 26% PRM reported for bull sharks on drumline gear in the NW Atlantic (n = 27 [ 39 ]) is over three times as high as our study, although this previous estimate was based on reporting rates of fin-mounted satellite tags and may overestimate mortality if tag failure or shark behavior prevent satellite transmissions. In blacktip sharks, PRM rates have previously been estimated at 9–23% in recreational fisheries [ 17 , 27 , 44 ], and we found substantially higher PRM for this species in the BLL fishery.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The estimate of 26% PRM reported for bull sharks on drumline gear in the NW Atlantic (n = 27 [ 39 ]) is over three times as high as our study, although this previous estimate was based on reporting rates of fin-mounted satellite tags and may overestimate mortality if tag failure or shark behavior prevent satellite transmissions. In blacktip sharks, PRM rates have previously been estimated at 9–23% in recreational fisheries [ 17 , 27 , 44 ], and we found substantially higher PRM for this species in the BLL fishery.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Blacktip sharks are the second most commonly caught species in this fishery [ 50 ] and, based on their blood stress values, are thought to be more susceptible to post-release mortality than other species [ 37 , 39 , 40 ]. Several recent studies have examined their PRM in recreational fisheries [ 17 , 27 , 44 , 45 , 51 ] but none have done so in a BLL fishery. Tiger, bull, and spinner sharks have not been the subject of recent population assessments in the region but, together with sandbar and blacktip, make up five of the seven most commonly caught sharks in the large coastal shark fishery in the Atlantic region [ 50 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This shore-or land-based shark fishing is a subsection of the recreational shark fishing sector and occurs around the globe, including in South Africa (Dicken et al 2006), Australia (Griffiths 2012), Argentina (Cuevas 2015), and Europe (authors, personal observations). In the United States, active shore-based shark fishing has been observed in several states, including California, Texas, the Carolinas, and finally, Florida (e.g., Kilfoil et al 2017;Shiffman et al 2017;Gibson et al 2019;Weber et al 2020). Compared to boat-based fisheries, shore-based shark fishing has a low barrier for entry given the ease of access and low cost of fishing from shore.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%