2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2021.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stress relief: emerging methods to mitigate dissociation-induced artefacts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it is currently difficult to analyze a small amount of starting cells such as those in human clinical samples. The dissociation process may cause a stress‐induced bias in gene expression of the tissue (Machado et al , 2021; Miyawaki‐Kuwakado et al , 2021). For this reason, epigenomic analysis using tissue sections has been widely used.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is currently difficult to analyze a small amount of starting cells such as those in human clinical samples. The dissociation process may cause a stress‐induced bias in gene expression of the tissue (Machado et al , 2021; Miyawaki‐Kuwakado et al , 2021). For this reason, epigenomic analysis using tissue sections has been widely used.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous methods for adult stem cell isolation required extensive tissue dissection and digestions, which were recently shown to elicit stress responses in stem cells. As a result, the transcriptome profiles of freshly isolated stem cells were skewed by disassociationinduced artefacts and may have failed to represent the genuine quiescent state [173][174][175]. Thus, previous transcriptome profiles derived from freshly isolated MuSCs should be revisited.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, previous transcriptome profiles derived from freshly isolated MuSCs should be revisited. New methods aiming to preserve the true quiescent state of stem cells by employing in situ fixation or nascent mRNA tagging have already advanced our understanding of the true quiescence signatures [38,119,161,174]. For example, IEGs such as Jun and Fos are highly expressed in freshly isolated MuSCs, but their mRNA levels are actually much lower in fixed MuSCs [38,175].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further examination using makers such as CD206, Siglec-H and CD38 that are expressed on BAMs and not microglia ( 51 ), as well as using histological techniques to define the locations of the chemotherapy-affected cells will be important to more accurately define the impacts of chemotherapy on the brain immune microenvironment especially given that the vasculature in the border regions would have different barrier properties compared to the blood-brain barrier of the parenchyma. Future work aimed at better understanding the immune cell dynamics within medulloblastomas may also consider first enriching for CD45 + cells prior to bulk RNA sequencing or employing single cell sequencing or single cell proteomics technologies to detect immune signatures in medulloblastoma tissue, though these methods are accompanied with the caveat of tissue processing induced artefacts [reviewed in ( 54 )]. Our sequencing data was limited by small sample sizes in this exploratory study and, in the case of CSI-treated tumors, by the choice to sample later time points when tumors were larger, but possibly too late after treatment cessation to detect gene expression differences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%