2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2017.06.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stress recovery from one dimensional models for tapered bi-symmetric thin-walled I beams: Deficiencies in modern engineering tools and procedures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The example is adapted from [9], which employs a planar non-prismatic beam model [8] with enhanced stress recovery, based on a rigorous generalisation of Jourawsky's theory. Solving this problem with the UF-SLE model requires two input meshes as shown in Figure 5.…”
Section: Tapered I-beammentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The example is adapted from [9], which employs a planar non-prismatic beam model [8] with enhanced stress recovery, based on a rigorous generalisation of Jourawsky's theory. Solving this problem with the UF-SLE model requires two input meshes as shown in Figure 5.…”
Section: Tapered I-beammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 3D FE analysis, performed with commercial finite element software ANSYS, is used as a reference for verification of the proposed UF-SLE model. Structured meshes of 400 × 3 × 20 and 400 × 50 × 4 elements, as given in [9], are adopted for the flanges and web, respectively, resulting in a global count of 64,000 SOLID186 (3D 20-noded) elements with 1,038,687 DOFs. In both the UF-SLE and 3D FE models, the applied shear force at the beam ends are modelled as vertical forces per unit area uniformly distributed over the web section.…”
Section: Tapered I-beammentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In consequence, circumferential shear stresses had linear components evoked by the axial force and parabolic ones caused by the moment and shear. Balduzzi et al (2017) demonstrated several approaches to calculating cross sections stress distribution within tapered thin-walled I-beams. The method proposed by the authors was distinguished by the difference between the calculated and actual values below 5% in all considered cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well-known in literature that beams with variable cross sections show a significantly different behaviour in contrast to prismatic beams. Variable cross-section beams exhibit a non-trivial stress distribution in particular the shear stresses evoked are counter intuitive and hardly predictable by the classical theory for prismatic beams [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%