2010
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph7031036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stress Recovery during Exposure to Nature Sound and Environmental Noise

Abstract: Research suggests that visual impressions of natural compared with urban environments facilitate recovery after psychological stress. To test whether auditory stimulation has similar effects, 40 subjects were exposed to sounds from nature or noisy environments after a stressful mental arithmetic task. Skin conductance level (SCL) was used to index sympathetic activation, and high frequency heart rate variability (HF HRV) was used to index parasympathetic activation. Although HF HRV showed no effects, SCL recov… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
389
3
11

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 613 publications
(452 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(27 reference statements)
19
389
3
11
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Browning et al the 14 biophilic design patterns can be organized into three categories to illustrate the enhancement of user experience and its biological responses, and potential impacts in different care levels: nature in the space, natural analogues and nature of the space. First, the direct experience of nature (nature in the space) that refers to real contact with nature in the built environment, such as the presence of natural light (positively impacted circadian system functioning, Figueiro et al 2011;Beckett andRoden 2009), thermal andairflow variability (positively impacted comfort andwell-being, Heerwagen 2006;Tham and Willem 2005;positively impacted concentration, Hartig et al 2003), presence of water (reduced stress, increased feeling of tranquillity, lower heart rate and blood pressure, Alvarsson and Wiens 2010;Pheasant et al 2010;Biederman and Vessel 2006), or the visual connection with nature for instance through abundance of plants and vegetation indoors or view of natural landscapes (lowered blood pressure and heart rate, Brown et al 2013;van den Berg et al 2007;Tsunetsugu and Miyazaki 2005).…”
Section: Benefits Of Biophilic Design In Hospital Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Browning et al the 14 biophilic design patterns can be organized into three categories to illustrate the enhancement of user experience and its biological responses, and potential impacts in different care levels: nature in the space, natural analogues and nature of the space. First, the direct experience of nature (nature in the space) that refers to real contact with nature in the built environment, such as the presence of natural light (positively impacted circadian system functioning, Figueiro et al 2011;Beckett andRoden 2009), thermal andairflow variability (positively impacted comfort andwell-being, Heerwagen 2006;Tham and Willem 2005;positively impacted concentration, Hartig et al 2003), presence of water (reduced stress, increased feeling of tranquillity, lower heart rate and blood pressure, Alvarsson and Wiens 2010;Pheasant et al 2010;Biederman and Vessel 2006), or the visual connection with nature for instance through abundance of plants and vegetation indoors or view of natural landscapes (lowered blood pressure and heart rate, Brown et al 2013;van den Berg et al 2007;Tsunetsugu and Miyazaki 2005).…”
Section: Benefits Of Biophilic Design In Hospital Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of SRT, Alvarsson et al (2010) found that a similar natural soundscape (birdsong and running water) was rated as more pleasant than sounds from the built environment, and induced faster recovery from stress as measured by skin conductance level. Goel and Etwaroo (2006) found that listening to birdsong accompanied by classical music reduced self-reported negative affect.…”
Section: Bird Sounds and Perceived Restorationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bird sounds feature commonly in studies that explore attention restoration and stress recovery via natural sounds and soundscapes (e.g. Alvarsson, Wien, & Nilsson, 2010) and particularly perceived restorativeness (e.g. Kjellgren & Buhrkall, 2010;Payne, 2012), but to date we are unaware of any published studies that seek to understand reasons why bird sounds might be perceived as restorative.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10-11). This observation is supported by numerous studies indicating somatic and psychological benefits for soundscape listening (Aghaie et al, 2014;Alvarsson, Wiens, & Nilsson, 2010), as well as increasing understanding of innate human physiological responses to sonic stimuli (Patton, 2003, p. 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%