2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.12.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stress intensity factor analysis of through thickness effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This has been done evaluating SIF along the thickness in fracture problem. Preliminary results were recently published . Based on 2‐D and 3‐D models, calculated applying a single load to the crack, two different methods were evaluated to obtain numerically the SIF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been done evaluating SIF along the thickness in fracture problem. Preliminary results were recently published . Based on 2‐D and 3‐D models, calculated applying a single load to the crack, two different methods were evaluated to obtain numerically the SIF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But since this is a nonlinear analysis, a better accuracy at less expense is obtained if a fine mesh of linear elements is used rather than a comparable coarse mesh of quadratic elements [29]. Besides, this kind of element has been employed due to the huge experience obtained by the present authors in previous works in which the accuracy of the model has been analysed [17,[30][31][32]. The plastic zone size is the scale reference to relate to the minimum element size.…”
Section: Fea Modelling Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the yielded area at the surface is equal to the yielded area in the mid-plane in all the applied load range for this case. This behaviour may be explained by the corner point singularity and the decrease of the stress intensity factor as a corner point is approached [32].…”
Section: Plastic Zone Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For thin components, the surface behaviour is normally representative of the T complete behaviour [7]. However, for many engineering components, the surface may not be at all representative of the majority of the bulk of the material [8,9] and not describe accurately the complete component behaviour [10,11]. Intense hard X-ray beams at synchrotron facilities now give us the possibility of probing the bulk of engineering materials both in terms of the geometry and in terms of elastic strain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%