2003
DOI: 10.1299/jsmecmd.2003.16.761
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stress intensity factor analysis for an interface crack between dissimilar anisotropic materials under thermal stress

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There exist variety of post processing techniques, within the framework of the EFG method, to compute the SIFs for a crack in isotropic and homogenous materials [48,49] and complex SIF for an interface crack [50][51][52][53][54][55]. The popular interaction integral/M-integral [56] technique is used to extract the complex SIF associated with an interface crack under mechanical and thermal loading.…”
Section: Interaction Integral To Extract Sifs and T-stressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There exist variety of post processing techniques, within the framework of the EFG method, to compute the SIFs for a crack in isotropic and homogenous materials [48,49] and complex SIF for an interface crack [50][51][52][53][54][55]. The popular interaction integral/M-integral [56] technique is used to extract the complex SIF associated with an interface crack under mechanical and thermal loading.…”
Section: Interaction Integral To Extract Sifs and T-stressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the virtual crack extension method (14) and the virtual crack closure method (15) (16) , which are used in conjunction with conventional FEM analysis, cannot be applied to evaluate the energy release rate. The domain form of the energy release rate …”
Section: Evaluation Of Energy Release Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In elastic problems, the energy release rate, which is one of fracture mechanics parameters, can be evaluated by the post processing for the results of X-FEM analysis, as well as FEM. Since the crack geometry does not always perfectly coincide with the element boundary in X-FEM models, neither the virtual crack closure method (14) nor the virtual crack extension method (15) (16) can be applied directly. Therefore, the domain integral method (17) (18) is used to evaluate the…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is di cult to derive the exact solutions for cracked bodies of nite dimension. On numerical aspect, a lot of studies have been performed based on the nite element method [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] and the boundary element method [26][27][28][29] to solve the interface crack problems of nite dimension. The methods mentioned above may be categorized as the direct methods, which have a common disadvantage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%