2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246x.2004.02212.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stress-induced temporal variations in seismic anisotropy observed in microseismic data

Abstract: S U M M A R YIn situ stress monitoring of crustal rocks is desirable as it yields insights into earthquake mechanisms, volcanic eruptions and changes in hydrocarbon reservoirs. Shear wave splitting, induced by stress-controlled cracks in the shallow crust, provides a way to infer this stress. Temporal variations in these observations can be difficult to quantify due to scatter in the data and discontinuous observations. Here we present evidence of temporal variations in shear wave splitting from a continuous t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
105
2
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
105
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An automated program developed by Savage et al [2010b], and based on the algorithms of Silver and Chan [1991] and Teanby et al [2004], was used to perform all SWS measurements in this study. The program grades each measurement and marks any null measurements in which no splitting result is obtained.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An automated program developed by Savage et al [2010b], and based on the algorithms of Silver and Chan [1991] and Teanby et al [2004], was used to perform all SWS measurements in this study. The program grades each measurement and marks any null measurements in which no splitting result is obtained.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several shear-wave splitting studies near recently ruptured fault zones have claimed to see temporal evolution of the crack field following a large magnitude earthquake or prior to earthquake swarms (e.g., Gao et al, 1998;Tadokoro et al, 1999;Teanby et al, 2004). However, a variety surveys have seen no postseismic change in anisotropic parameters in the months following large magnitude earthquakes (e.g., Cochran et al, 2003;Peng and Ben-Zion, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that seismic velocities and anisotropy are modulated by 61 non-hydrostatic stress changes (e.g., Nur and Simmons, 1969;Zatsepin and 62 Crampin, 1997; Teanby et al, 2004b;Verdon et al, 2008a), so observations 63 of shear wave splitting -a key indicator of anisotropy -made on waves 64 generated by microseismic events can also be used to inform geomechanical 65 models. (White, 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%