Objective
This study examined the factorial and construct validity of the Social Provisions Scale (SPS) in a sample of people with multiple sclerosis (MS).
Method
Participants included 292 individuals with MS (83.9% women) recruited from the Greater Illinois, Gateway, and Indiana chapters of the National Multiple Sclerosis Society. Participants completed the SPS and pain, fatigue, depression, anxiety, MS self-efficacy, quality of life and satisfaction with life measures. Factorial validity was tested using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and construct validity was examined based on the strength of bivariate correlations with scores on related measures.
Results
Findings from the CFA indicated that a first-order, six-factor measurement model provided a good fit for the 24 items of the SPS (CFI = .94, TLI= .93, RMSEA = 0.07) and that the six factors could be described by a single, second-order factor of the overall social provisions (CFI = .93, TLI= .92, RMSEA = 0.08). Cronbach’s alpha was .89 for the global score and between .66 and .81 for the six subscales. The SPS global and subscale scores correlated significantly with satisfaction with life, depression, anxiety, MS self-efficacy, and quality of life measures.
Conclusions
Findings from this study support the factorial validity, construct validity, and reliability of the SPS as a measure of social provisions for use with people with MS.