2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2011.06.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stress hyperglycemia may not be harmful in critically ill patients with sepsis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An increase in glucose can be attributed to stress conditions. This phenomenon is in compliance with searched literature (Tiruvoipati et al 2011). Hyperglycaemia and glycosuria were also reported to be pathological consequences of accidental exposure to organophosphorus and carbamate pesticides (Shobha and Prakash 2000).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…An increase in glucose can be attributed to stress conditions. This phenomenon is in compliance with searched literature (Tiruvoipati et al 2011). Hyperglycaemia and glycosuria were also reported to be pathological consequences of accidental exposure to organophosphorus and carbamate pesticides (Shobha and Prakash 2000).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In septic patients, hyperglycemia up to a certain degree is even considered to be beneficial, as increased levels of blood glucose concentration might be a way to ensure sufficient supply of glucose to peripheral cells in case of hypoperfusion [6, 7]. On the other hand, hyperglycemia, especially severe hyperglycemia defined as blood glucose concentration > 200 mg/dL, was reported to be associated with adverse outcome and considered as a bad prognostic marker in various diseases, e.g., sepsis, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and pulmonary embolism [8, 9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, there are discordant findings on the correlation between hyperglycemia and adverse outcomes in acutely ill patients with or without preexisting diabetes678.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%