Advanced Materials Science and Engineering of Carbon 2014
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-407789-8.00005-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stress Graphitization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These diffraction peaks reported an average interlayer spacing ( d 002 ) of 0.33225 nm to 0.337 nm, as shown in Figure 2b. The d 002 which remained constant, was identified as a graphitic structure, which was similarly reported by other studies [31,32,33]. Accordingly, this indicated that there was no drastic change in the structure of the composite during the compression moulding process [34].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…These diffraction peaks reported an average interlayer spacing ( d 002 ) of 0.33225 nm to 0.337 nm, as shown in Figure 2b. The d 002 which remained constant, was identified as a graphitic structure, which was similarly reported by other studies [31,32,33]. Accordingly, this indicated that there was no drastic change in the structure of the composite during the compression moulding process [34].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The recrystallization of carbon material is strongly dependent on the nanostructure of the precursor material, and the nanostructures can be divided into two types, called soft (graphitizing) carbon and hard (non-graphitizing) carbon, based on TEM observations (Inagaki et al 2014). Hard carbon consists of small hollow particles with walls that comprise a few carbon sheets, while soft carbon already has distorted fringes of carbon sheets.…”
Section: Pressure Dependence Of Graphitizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a difference in nanostructure results in the large differences in final crystal size and annealing temperature when graphite is synthesized from amorphous carbon in the laboratory (e.g., Inagaki 1996). The acceleration of graphitization occurs (even at 0.5 GPa) as a result of the collapse, under hydrostatic pressure, of the small hollow particles with walls (Inagaki et al 2014). This process is more marked in the hard carbon, resulting in the heterogeneous recrystallization of amorphous carbon to a graphitic carbon.…”
Section: Pressure Dependence Of Graphitizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, pure graphitization of amorphous carbon (a-C) requires a temperature higher than 3300 K, typically combined with high pressure. [25][26][27] The temperature of catalytic graphitization using transitional metals as catalysts lowers to around 1300 K, but find that Cu is not able to induce graphitization of solid carbon precursors. [28][29][30][31] The chemistry of different carbon precursors at a Cu surface could be similar, namely, as like a gas phase precursor, decomposition of the precursor, surface diffusion and nucleation, island growth, and island merger to generate a continuous graphene film.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%