Abstract:The accurate diagnosis of stress-induced changes in the foot and ankle requires careful and detailed clinical history and examination. This is of paramount importance in ensuring the correct imaging interpretation and for excluding other differential diagnoses. Advanced imaging (scintigraphy and MR imaging) plays a vital role in the early diagnosis of this type of injury, and CT has an important contributory role in the diagnosis of injury where imaging features by the other modalities are equivocal. An early … Show more
“…2). 20,21 This sensitivity of MRI relies on the ability to detect early bone marrow oedema, the hallmark of the stress response. 17,22 A grading system developed by Kiuru et al 23 (Table 4) demonstrates how the sequential detection of oedema using STIR, T2WIs and T1WIs increases as the severity of the stress response increases.…”
“…2). 20,21 This sensitivity of MRI relies on the ability to detect early bone marrow oedema, the hallmark of the stress response. 17,22 A grading system developed by Kiuru et al 23 (Table 4) demonstrates how the sequential detection of oedema using STIR, T2WIs and T1WIs increases as the severity of the stress response increases.…”
“…In addition to the increased incidence of stress fractures in women, they tend to show a different distribution of injury, with the female pelvis and metatarsals more common, and the fibula less affected [24]. For foot and ankle overuse injuries, other potential contributing factors include malalignments (hyper/hypo-pronation, pes planus/cavus, forefoot or hindfoot varus/valgus, tibia vara, genu valgum/ varum), limb length discrepancies, tarsal coalition, previous surgeries or trauma to the same or opposite limb, joint laxity or instability, and muscles weakness or imbalance [25]. All of these factors can alter the complex biomechanics and weightbearing dynamics of the lower extremity and place undo stresses on one bone or set of bones to compensate for these alignment abnormalities or other deficiencies.…”
Section: Fatigue Fracturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several predisposing factors have been identified as the cause of insufficiency fractures with the common entity often being osteoporosis (primary or secondary). Other risk factors include rheumatoid arthritis, metabolic bone disease, neurological disorders, prior irradiation, total hip replacement, corticosteroid therapy, high-dose fluoride therapy, and bisphosphonate therapy, among others [6,7,25,27]. In these situations, bone elasticity and mineral content are compromised.…”
Section: Insufficiency Fracturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On conventional radiographs, the differential diagnosis of stress injuries includes normal cortical thickening, normal nutrient artery channel, osteomyelitis/Brodie abscess, osteoid osteoma, other neoplasms (e.g., surface osteosarcoma or metastasis), osteitis pubis, and avascular necrosis [25]. This differential diagnosis is summarized in Table 4.…”
Stress fracture, in its most inclusive description, includes both fatigue and insufficiency fracture. Fatigue fractures, sometimes equated with the term "stress fractures," are most common in runners and other athletes and typically occur in the lower extremities. These fractures are the result of abnormal, cyclical loading on normal bone leading to local cortical resorption and fracture. Insufficiency fractures are common in elderly populations, secondary to osteoporosis, and are typically located in and around the pelvis. They are a result of normal or traumatic loading on abnormal bone. Subchondral insufficiency fractures of the hip or knee may cause acute pain that may present in the emergency setting. Medial tibial stress syndrome is a type of stress injury of the tibia related to activity and is a clinical syndrome encompassing a range of injuries from stress edema to frank-displaced fracture. Atypical subtrochanteric femoral fracture associated with long-term bisphosphonate therapy is also a recently discovered entity that needs early recognition to prevent progression to a complete fracture. Imaging recommendations for evaluation of stress fractures include initial plain radiographs followed, if necessary, by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which is preferred over computed tomography (CT) and bone scintigraphy. Radiographs are the first-line modality and may reveal linear sclerosis and periosteal reaction prior to the development of a frank fracture. MRI is highly sensitive with findings ranging from periosteal edema to bone marrow and intracortical signal abnormality. Additionally, a brief description of relevant clinical management of stress fractures is included.
“…Multiple views are required and often are unsatisfactory due to superimposition of multiple adjacent bones that form the complex skeletal structure of this anatomy [3] . Multi-detector Computed Tomography (MDCT) is an good diagnostic alternative and permits isolation and visualization of separate bony structures [4,5] ; however, this examination is expensive, limited in availability to hospitals and large radiology practices, and is associated with significantly increased x-ray dose in relation to plain views.…”
Aims: This study compares effective doses associated with 2D lateral, oblique, and AP radiographs with 3D MDCT and Cone Beam CT images of the foot and ankle.Methods: An anthropomorphic phantom of the foot and ankle was constructed from an adult human skeleton and soft tissue equivalent material. Optical stimulated dosimeters were placed at 21 locations within and on tissues and anatomy of interest. Effective dose was calculated following 2007 ICRP recommendations. Three projections were exposed to simulate conventional 2D imaging. Standard and optimized dose MDCT scans were exposed to simulate typical CT options. Ten, 20, and 30cm fields of view, 100 and 120kVp and 4.5 and 6.8mAs exposures were tested using a PedCAT® CBCT device designed for weightbearing imaging. Dose was calculated for an adult as well as for a 5 and 10-year-old child to assess the impact of age on risk estimation.Results: Standard adult effective doses for single foot imaging were 0.6µSv for 2D, 3.8µSv for CBCT, and 25µSv for MDCT (p = 0.0013). Dose differed significantly with age (p = 0.0185). For a 5-year-old, doses rise to 0.8µSv for 2D, 18µSv for CBCT, and 200µSv for MDCT. Small and medium CBCT fields produced adult doses of 2.3 mSv and 0.9 mSv respectively.
Conclusions:The effective dose for small FOV CBCT or conventional 2D series examinations is comparable to a few hours of equivalent background dose. Such doses are negligible; therefore, the dose of radiation should not be a concern when considering the use of CBCT imaging for foot/ankle examination.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.