2000
DOI: 10.1016/s8756-3282(00)00342-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stress fracture in military recruits: gender differences in muscle and bone susceptibility factors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

14
195
1
4

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 279 publications
(214 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
14
195
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, there would appear to be a biological constraint in the level to which cellular processes (eg, osteoclastic/osteoblastic-driven modeling and remodeling) can be adjusted to mechanically compensate for the natural variation in robustness. It is well known that women tend to have more slender bones than men for a given body size [1,18,19,22], putting them at greater risk of fracturing under extreme loading conditions (eg, military training and falls among the elderly) [1,11,12,17]. However, it had yet to be determined whether this difference in strength is the result of fundamental differences in the manner by which men and women construct bone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, there would appear to be a biological constraint in the level to which cellular processes (eg, osteoclastic/osteoblastic-driven modeling and remodeling) can be adjusted to mechanically compensate for the natural variation in robustness. It is well known that women tend to have more slender bones than men for a given body size [1,18,19,22], putting them at greater risk of fracturing under extreme loading conditions (eg, military training and falls among the elderly) [1,11,12,17]. However, it had yet to be determined whether this difference in strength is the result of fundamental differences in the manner by which men and women construct bone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many have suggested this sex difference in fracture risk, both within and across ethnicities, is predominantly attributable to body size [8,16,22,23] and hormonal differences [14,24]. When looking at population averages within both ethnicities, men have wider bones of greater cortical mass compared with women [1,18,19,22]. This knowledge is often used to identify traits that contribute to fracture susceptibility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, an association between low BMD and stress fractures has been reported in female athletes including dancers [24] [25] [26]. However, BMD represents only one aspect of bone strength.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…52 Women have a lower bone-section modulus; a lower bone-strength index (ratio of section modulus to bone length); and a thinner and narrower cortical area, which provides less bone strength. 53 These factors may increase females' susceptibility to fractures on ground impact during parachuting.…”
Section: Personal Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%