Stress factors predicting injuries of hospital personnel

Salminen, Simo; Kivimäki, Mika; Elovainio, Marko; Vahtera, Jussi

doi:10.1002/ajim.10235

Cited by 62 publications

(70 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This preventive effect agrees with past findings that interpersonal relations at work affect total injury risk 4,5) .…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

“…Injured workers are more likely to report a higher stressors frequency (OR=1.4 (0.9-2.0)), resulting in a monotonic dose-response relationship between stress reaction and injury (p=0.02) 3) . Workers with problems in their interpersonal relationships (RR=1.43; 1.18-1.73) or coworker relationships (RR=1.40; 1.15-1.71) also report greater risk for injury 4) . Specifically, supervisor conflict (RR=2.49 (1.42-4.37)), coworker conflict (RR=2.62; 0.58-4.35), and high emotional demands (RR=2.45; 1.52-3.94) increased injury risk 5) .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Risk Factors for Work-related Injuries among University Student Employees

Thygerson

2012

Ind Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…This preventive effect agrees with past findings that interpersonal relations at work affect total injury risk 4,5) .…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Risk Factors for Work-related Injuries among University Student Employees

Thygerson

2012

Ind Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…In contrast, men showed no difference in occupa- tional injury rate according to decision latitude. In hospital workers, the risk for occupational injury was higher in workers with lower job control [Salminen et al, 2003], and female Japanese workers in small-and medium-sized manufacturing enterprises reported a significantly lower job control score than men, which was related to an observable increase in occupational injuries [Nakata et al, 2006]. In some studies, however, no correlation was observed between decision latitude and occupational injury [Murata et al, 2000;Swaen et al, 2004].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 94%

Job strain and the risk for occupational injury in small‐ to medium‐sized manufacturing enterprises: A prospective study of 1,209 Korean employees

Kim

Min

et al. 2009

American J Industrial Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The aim of this study was to investigate whether job strain had an effect on the risk of occupational injury of workers at small‐ to medium‐sized manufacturing companies. Methods We conducted a prospective follow‐up survey and finally 1,209 workers in South Korea were included in this study. At time X1, we measured job stress with the Job Demand and Decision Latitude Questionnaire; and at time X2 (after 6 months), we evaluated occupational injuries through a single question. Occupational injuries were assessed using the question “Have you ever been injured at work, including minor scratches and cuts, in the previous four‐month period” by self‐reporting in the previous 4‐month period. Results For men, the high job‐demand group (OR = 1.71, 95% CI = 1.13–2.59) and high strain group (OR = 1.79, 95% CI = 1.02–3.14) showed the increased risk of occupational injury. For women, high job‐demand (OR = 2.11, 95% CI = 1.18–3.78), low job control (OR = 1.80, 95% CI = 1.02–3.17), and high job strain (OR = 3.57, 95% CI = 1.62–7.86) were significantly associated with occupational injury. Conclusion Workers under high job strain showed higher risk for occupational injury. The efforts to minimize stress‐related occupational injuries should be required. Am. J. Ind. Med. 52:322–330, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

show abstract

“…Fourth, it is possible that work-related stressors are an intermediated step in a pathway leading from depressive symptoms to the occurrence of occupational injuries. Several studies have demonstrated a relationship between occupational injury and work related stressors [e.g., decision latitude and job demand (Nakata et al 2006;Salminen et al 2003;Swaen et al 2004), low social support (Murata et al 2000;Wilkins and Beaudet 1998), interpersonal conXicts (Greiner et al 1998;Salminen et al 2003), job dissatisfaction (Dembe et al 2004;Holcom et al 1993;Li et al 2001;Nakata et al 2006)]. Conversely, these factors may aVect depressive symptoms, which in turn may work as intervening variables aVecting the occurrence of occupational injuries.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Depressive symptoms and self-reported occupational injury in small and medium-sized companies

Kim¹,

Park²,

Min³

et al. 2008

Int Arch Occup Environ Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives This survey was designed to determine whether depressive symptoms had an eVect on the risk of self-reported occupational injury in South Korea. Methods We conducted a prospective follow-up survey of workers at 44 small-to medium-sized companies classiWed into manufacturing or service businesses; 1,350 questionnaires were used in the Wnal analysis. The Wrst survey requested information regarding personal characteristics, work characteristics, and depressive symptoms (CES-D); the second survey queried participants in the Wrst survey about self-reported occupational injuries (including minor scratches or cuts) experienced in the previous 4 months. Risk ratios (RRs) were calculated through Poisson regression analysis. The number of occupational injuries during the previous 4 months served as the dependent variable, and depressive symptoms served as the independent variable. Results After adjustment for demographic factors, the RRs were 1.75 (95% CI: 1.41-2.18) and 2.68 (95% CI: 1.98-3.64) in male and female, respectively. Additional adjustment for work-related variables did not alter the RR considerably in females (2.65; 95% CI: 1.95-3.59). Among the male workers, however, the RR was not signiWcant (1.21; 95% CI: 0.95-1.55). On the other hand, when the analysis was limited to blue-collar workers, after adjustment for demographic and work-related factors, the RRs remained signiWcant in both genders (male: 1.34; 95% CI: 1.03-1.74; female: 2.04; 95% CI: 1.41-2.95). Conclusions We found that the risk of self-reported occupational injury experience was higher in workers who reported depressive symptoms. Additional study using objective data is required to conWrm our results.

show abstract

Stress factors predicting injuries of hospital personnel

Abstract: This study showed that stressors related to autonomy of work and interpersonal relationship at workplace are predictors of injuries in hospital settings. These factors are potentially amenable to organizational interventions.

Cited by 62 publications

References 22 publications

Risk Factors for Work-related Injuries among University Student Employees

Risk Factors for Work-related Injuries among University Student Employees

Job strain and the risk for occupational injury in small‐ to medium‐sized manufacturing enterprises: A prospective study of 1,209 Korean employees

Depressive symptoms and self-reported occupational injury in small and medium-sized companies

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About