2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0268-0033(01)00047-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stress distribution of the foot during mid-stance to push-off in barefoot gait: a 3-D finite element analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
91
0
7

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
91
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the foot bones, cartilages and joints were assumed to be homogeneous, isotropic and linearly elastic [12]. Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio were 10 GPa and 0.34, respectively [1]. …”
Section: Finite Element Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In this study, the foot bones, cartilages and joints were assumed to be homogeneous, isotropic and linearly elastic [12]. Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio were 10 GPa and 0.34, respectively [1]. …”
Section: Finite Element Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the reconstructions using ilium, ÿbula and scapula were evaluated. Young's moduli being equal to 14.8 [15], 11.46 [16] and 10 GPa [1] for the ilium, ÿbula and scapula, respectively; and Poisson's ratios 0.28 [15], 0.2 [16] and 0.34 [1], correspondingly. The size of bone block was determined based on the measurement of the corresponding site of the healthy skeleton specimen and conformed to the anatomic data.…”
Section: Finite Element Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(Chen, 2001) The use of anatomically accurate finite element (FEM) models of the human foot in research studies has increased rapidly in recent years. Some studies creates a 3D mathematical model using the reconstruction of the foot by MRI or CT (Cheung, 2005a;Cheung, 2005b;Camacho, 2002;Chen, 2001), or the foot scanning (Lochner, 2014;Telfer, 2010). Both methods (from MRI and CT) for developing patient-specific anatomical geometry are time consuming, expensive and impractical for use on a per-patient basis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%